Laserfiche WebLink
SECTIQNTWO Summary of Field Sampling and Laboratory Analyses <br /> 2.4 DATA VALIDATION <br /> A quality assurance evaluation of the analytical data provided by Chromalab Analytical <br /> Laboratory from sod and groundwater samples collected at 1010 46th Street on August 2-3, 1999 <br /> was undertaken to confirm the accuracy and precision of the laboratory results for use in this <br /> report A total of 28 soil samples and one groundwater sample were collected <br /> Upon receipt of the final laboratory reports, the following steps were taken in accordance with <br /> the EPA guidance for data validation Sample custody documents were cross-checked with <br /> laboratory reports for sampling dates and required analyses Holding times were calculated <br /> using analysis date, preparation date, and/or test date in relation to sampling date The results <br /> were reviewed for QA/QC elements of precision, accuracy, reporting limits, and contamination <br /> The following QA/QC parameters were reviewed during data evaluation <br /> o Chain of Custody - Verify that requested analyses were performed and sampling dates are <br /> accurately noted in lab reports <br /> o Holding Times - Check for holding times in excess of EPA guidelines <br /> o Method Blanks - Review blank analyses for evidence of potential contamination <br /> o Matrix Spikes - Review spike and spike duplicate recoveries and relative percent differences <br /> (RPDs) as a check for analytical precision and accuracy <br /> o Laboratory Control Samples - Review control and control duplicate recoveries and relative <br /> percent differences (RPD-;) as a check for analytical accuracy and precision <br /> o Surrogates - Review surrogate recoveries as a check for sample specific accuracy <br /> 2 41 Chain of Custody <br /> All analyses were performed as requested and samples were adequately accounted for throughout <br /> ithe transfer from field to lab <br /> 2.4.2 Holding Times <br /> Holding time, (the time between sampling and sample preparation/analysis) was not exceeded in <br /> any case <br /> 2 4.3 Method Blanks <br /> Blank samples are analyzed in the same manner as field samples Laboratory method blanks <br /> consist of reagents specific to each individual analytical method that were prepared and analyzed <br /> by the laboratory to assess potential sample contamination within the laboratory <br /> Method blanks did not reveal any laboratory contamination <br /> 2.4 4 Matrix Spike <br /> . Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate samples are prepared at the laboratory by dividing a <br /> control sample into two aliquots, then spiking each with identical concentrations of specific <br /> URS Greiner Woodward Clyde 1109967049\UST REPORT CHEROKEE DOC122 SEP 991\OAK 2-3 <br />