My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001894
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
1645
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544495
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001894
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 11:20:58 AM
Creation date
5/28/2019 10:57:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001894
RECORD_ID
PR0544495
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003688
FACILITY_NAME
INDUSTRIAL RAILWAYS COMPANY - STOCKTON YARD
STREET_NUMBER
1645
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
11910013
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1645 CHEROKEE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTIQNTWO Summary of Field Sampling and Laboratory Analyses <br /> 2.4 DATA VALIDATION <br /> A quality assurance evaluation of the analytical data provided by Chromalab Analytical <br /> Laboratory from sod and groundwater samples collected at 1010 46th Street on August 2-3, 1999 <br /> was undertaken to confirm the accuracy and precision of the laboratory results for use in this <br /> report A total of 28 soil samples and one groundwater sample were collected <br /> Upon receipt of the final laboratory reports, the following steps were taken in accordance with <br /> the EPA guidance for data validation Sample custody documents were cross-checked with <br /> laboratory reports for sampling dates and required analyses Holding times were calculated <br /> using analysis date, preparation date, and/or test date in relation to sampling date The results <br /> were reviewed for QA/QC elements of precision, accuracy, reporting limits, and contamination <br /> The following QA/QC parameters were reviewed during data evaluation <br /> o Chain of Custody - Verify that requested analyses were performed and sampling dates are <br /> accurately noted in lab reports <br /> o Holding Times - Check for holding times in excess of EPA guidelines <br /> o Method Blanks - Review blank analyses for evidence of potential contamination <br /> o Matrix Spikes - Review spike and spike duplicate recoveries and relative percent differences <br /> (RPDs) as a check for analytical precision and accuracy <br /> o Laboratory Control Samples - Review control and control duplicate recoveries and relative <br /> percent differences (RPD-;) as a check for analytical accuracy and precision <br /> o Surrogates - Review surrogate recoveries as a check for sample specific accuracy <br /> 2 41 Chain of Custody <br /> All analyses were performed as requested and samples were adequately accounted for throughout <br /> ithe transfer from field to lab <br /> 2.4.2 Holding Times <br /> Holding time, (the time between sampling and sample preparation/analysis) was not exceeded in <br /> any case <br /> 2 4.3 Method Blanks <br /> Blank samples are analyzed in the same manner as field samples Laboratory method blanks <br /> consist of reagents specific to each individual analytical method that were prepared and analyzed <br /> by the laboratory to assess potential sample contamination within the laboratory <br /> Method blanks did not reveal any laboratory contamination <br /> 2.4 4 Matrix Spike <br /> . Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate samples are prepared at the laboratory by dividing a <br /> control sample into two aliquots, then spiking each with identical concentrations of specific <br /> URS Greiner Woodward Clyde 1109967049\UST REPORT CHEROKEE DOC122 SEP 991\OAK 2-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.