My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY 1986 -1993
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
3535
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544497
>
SITE HISTORY 1986 -1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 2:09:47 PM
Creation date
5/28/2019 2:04:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
FileName_PostFix
1986 -1993
RECORD_ID
PR0544497
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003687
FACILITY_NAME
OLD TRUCK STOP, THE
STREET_NUMBER
3535
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13206009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3535 CHEROKEE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLICTH SERVICES <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br /> UGST SITE MITIGATION UNIT- GENERAL RISK APPRAISAL <br /> Explanation of the General Risk Appraisal: <br /> i to Address 3&6 S C h ego kee led <br /> The general risk appraisal was developed using <br /> ite Code (0 a <br /> facility Name I Rog C6 li_,yCl� environmental fate and chemistry data for BTX&E <br /> to evaluate the risk of groundwater pollution <br /> from LUFT sites under severe conditions. This <br /> risk appraisal requires a limited amount of site- <br /> . Is the site in a mountainous area? (Shaded NO YES specific information; conservative assumptions <br /> moist areas and/or areas with rocky subsurface have been substituted for other site-specific <br /> conditions) information. For these reasons, the general risk <br /> appraisal is more sophisticated than the Leaching <br /> . Is the site in an area that could collect surface Potential Analysis. <br /> runoff or intercept water from a source other than <br /> the natural precipitation? <br /> . Does the areal extent of soil contamination exceed <br /> 1000 ft2? <br /> . Do the concentrations of fuel constituents in any <br /> soil samples exceed the following amounts? <br /> [benzene: 100 ppm; toluene: 80 ppm; xylene: 40 ppm; ✓ _ ,p�,r•1 5 7e I" <br /> ethylbenzene: 40 ppm] � _ <br /> 5. Are there any records or evidence of man-made or <br /> natural objects which could provide a conduit for <br /> vertical migration of leachate? [septic systems. </ <br /> Leaching fields; wells; soil borings] J C/h <br /> 5. Do any boring or excavation logs show the presence <br /> of fractures, joints or faults that could act as a <br /> conduit for vertical migration of leachate? <br /> . Do any boring logs show that contaminated soil could <br /> be within 5 feet of highest c-ound water? <br /> 3. Do any boring logs show the presence of a Layer of Q� <br /> material, 5 feet thick or more, which is more than <br /> 75% sand and/or gravel (coarse soil)? <br /> Directions: <br /> 1. Boring Logs drilling at the site can be used to answer questions <br /> 5 - 8. Analytical results of the soil samples collected during the <br /> borings can be used to answer questions 3 and 4. <br /> 2. Lateral migration of constituents to problem areas should also be <br /> considered in questions 5-8. <br /> NOTE: The above checklist contains questions which are designed to identify <br /> sites with environmental conditions which could produce a greater risk <br /> to groundwater than was modeled through the usage of the Leaching Potential <br /> Analysis. The results of the general risk appraisal are most applicable <br /> if all the questions on the checklist can be answered "no" with reasonable <br /> certainty. If any of the questions on the checklist cannot be Awered <br /> "no", then the results of the general risk appraisal may be Less valid. <br /> If answers to the checklist questions indicate that the general risk <br /> appraisal results are not valid enough to be practical, then the LOFT <br /> Environmental Fate Worksheet should be considered. <br /> EH UNIT VI 2/91 RISKASMT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.