My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS 2002 - 2013
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
3535
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544497
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS 2002 - 2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 2:46:52 PM
Creation date
5/28/2019 2:32:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
2002 - 2013
RECORD_ID
PR0544497
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003687
FACILITY_NAME
OLD TRUCK STOP, THE
STREET_NUMBER
3535
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13206009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3535 CHEROKEE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> 19 October 2012 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 97-0312 <br /> Page 9 of 22 <br /> Chemical properties and health risk data for 26 chemicals of possible concern are supplied <br /> in the program including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes. Total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons (TPH) is not an individual chemical with definite properties, and therefore is <br /> not included on the list of chemical choices. Output can be displayed in several ways, <br /> too including annual reports, tables and graphs. <br /> WW 3.1.2 Site Specific Conditions <br /> Based on data collected from the site and cross sections generated, two areas of greatest <br /> concern were identified and examined; the former UST cluster location and the area near <br /> monitoring well MW-5. Cross sections of the impacted soil plume were depicted in the AGE <br /> prepared Quarterly Report-September 1999, dated 29 December 1999. Both areas were <br /> divided into four layers based on hydrocarbon concentrations. The soil profile beneath the <br /> site is reasonably vertically homogeneous, consisting primarily of silt. <br /> `r Mass calculations for the first area were based on data from samples collected in the UST <br /> cluster excavation, soil stockpile samples and boring B14. The top layer consists of the <br /> stockpiled soil returned to the excavation and non-impacted fill dirt from surface grade to <br /> 4.6 meters (15 feet); the second layer is impacted soil from 4.6 to 6.7 meters (15 to 22 <br /> feet); the third layer is slightly-impacted soil from 6.7 to 10.4 meters(22 to 34 feet); and the <br /> fourth layer is the non-impacted soil from 10.4 to 15.0 meters (34 to 49 feet). The area of <br /> impacted soil was arbitrarily defined as 5 meters by 5 meters with all mass calculations <br /> based on this area. <br /> w <br /> The mass of contaminants in the upper-most section was based upon the average <br /> concentrations of soil stockpile samples for the soil placed back into the excavation. Mass <br /> tow calculations for the second layer were based on the highest concentrations detected in the <br /> UST excavation and boring B14 samples. BTEX compounds were not detected in boring <br /> B14 below a depth of 20 feet. Therefore, the detection limit of 0.005 mg/kg was used to <br /> r.., calculate a maximum mass of contaminants in the third and fourth layers. <br /> Calculations for the second area were based on data from boring MW-5. The area was <br /> divided into four layers; from surface grade to 7.0 meters(23 feet), from 7.0 to 11.3 meters <br /> (23 to 37 feet), from 11.3 to 14.3 meters (37 to 47 feet), and from 14.3 to 15.3 meters (47 <br /> to 50 feet). The area of impacted soil was arbitrarily defined as 5 meters by 5 meters with <br /> .. all mass calculations based on this area. For each layer, the maximum concentration <br /> detected in soil samples within that layer was assumed for the entire layer. <br /> • General site stratigraphy was defined from numerous soil borings advanced at the site. <br /> Permeability values were estimated from general soil characteristics. Climatic parameters <br /> were estimated from historical local weather conditions.An average hydraulic gradientwas <br /> r <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.