Laserfiche WebLink
1.1 <br /> V <br /> 19 October 2012 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 97-0312 <br /> Page 16 of 22 <br /> • TPH-d in accordance with NIOSH 1550 for total extractable petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons. <br /> 6.2. RESULTS OF EIGHT-HOUR HVSVE PILOT TEST <br /> The HVSVE pilot test operated at the site for approximately eight-hours. Initially the <br /> HVSVE operated at normal conditions at approximately 10 inches of mercury. However, <br /> following approximately 30 minutes of high vacuum extraction, the catalytic oxidizer began <br /> a endothermic reaction; which resulted in over heating from the fuel within the soil vapor <br /> giving off greater heat than could be dissipated through advective flow of soil vapor. <br /> From the location of well VW-1, prior to the inlet of the HVSVE unit, the flow rate was <br /> measured to be between 86 SCFM at the start of the test when 10 inches of mercury was <br /> applied to nearly 35 SCFM when the HVSVE equilibrated at a vacuum of 5 inches of <br /> mercury. The average flow rate over the pilot test was 45 SCFM, however, the maximum <br /> flow rate would have been maintained if not for the over heating of the catalytic oxidation <br /> chamber and cell. The greatest OVM readings ranged from 1,700 to 2,300 parts per parts <br /> per million volume (ppmv). The induced vacuum extracted vapor from well VW-1 over 100 <br /> inches of water (IOW) during operation. From the surrounding observation wells, the <br /> greatest induced vacuum measurement was observed at vapor extraction well VW-2 <br /> (located 40 feet west of VW-1) at 1.15 IOW and an induced vacuum was generally <br /> observed in well VW-3 (located 30 feet east of VW-1), at measurements as high as 0.9 <br /> IOW. <br /> The maximum vacuum measured at wells VW-2,VW-3 during the 8-hour HVSVE pilot test <br /> was plotted versus the distance from the extraction well. The effective radius of influence <br /> was determined by generating a linear best-fit line through the shallow soil vapor well data <br /> points to correlate distance to vacuum data. Based on the United States Environmental <br /> Protection Agency (EPA)-prepared document, How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup <br /> Technologies For UST sites the radius of influence is considered to be the distance from <br /> the extraction well at which a vacuum of at least 0.1 inches of water is observed. Based <br /> upon an effective vacuum potential of 0.1 inches of water, the calculated effective radius <br /> of influence at the site is approximately 50 feet. Based on the fine grained soil type at the <br /> site, a conservative soil vapor remediation radius was anticipated. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironlnentnl,Inc. <br /> �1 <br />