Laserfiche WebLink
.'"0_ ter. _ryehe•- T' },•rte-, <br /> - <br /> 6.1 <br /> ?`� e�pm;acs:�susz�xier.r,ep <br /> ' were submitted for laboratory analysis. These samples were selected to demonstrate <br /> hydrocarbon distribution in the soil below 50 feet. The samples were analyzed for Total <br /> Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPP.G)and diesel(TPHD),using EPA method 8015 <br /> :.4 and the appropriate extraction, and for Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes <br /> t (BTEX) using EPA method 8020. Table 1 - Soil and Water Analytical Results of Well <br /> ' UST,1 presents the analytical results. These analyses show TP14G levels ranging from 480 <br /> i parts per million(ppm) at 50 feet to nondetectable (<1 ppm) at 85 feet. BTEX levels in <br /> the soil (samples ranged from 25,000 parts per billion (ppb) at 50 feet to nondetectable <br /> ' (<25 ppb) at 85 feet. <br /> rt ' <br /> A ground-water sample was obtained from the well with a stainless steel bailer after purging <br /> r approximately five casing volumes of water with a submersible pump to assure a sample <br /> i s representative of the aquifer. This sample contained 033 mg/L TPHG,0.80 mg/L TPHD, <br /> s and BTEX levels ranging from 0.7 to 45 ug/L The sample was also analyzed for soluble . <br /> t i lead using EPA method 7421. No lead was detected in the ground-water sample. The <br /> Benzene concentraton of 45 ppb is the only BTEX component which exceeds California <br /> i regulatory thresholds (1 ppb for Benzene). <br /> s7 i a <br /> !r ; <br /> I 3 Laboratory reports and chain of custody documents for the soil and ground-water samples <br /> are contained in Appendix B. <br /> i <br /> 3.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> The ground water beneath the site contains detectable levels of hydrocarbons which have <br /> probably migrated from the soil above. Only the Benzene concentration of 4.5 ppb exceeds <br /> California regulatory thresholds for ground water. The lateral and vertical extent of <br /> hydrocarbons in the soil was estimated during the May 1990 investigation. The extent of <br /> the hydrocarbon plume in the ground water has not been established, although it is <br /> probably not very extensive in view of the low levels of hydrocarbons found in this well. <br /> m. <br /> 3 <br />