ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001913 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Iu , 1 1 I � k Quarterly Report - First Quarter 2003 w • ` CHEROKEE TRUCK STOP 3535 East Cherokee Road, Stockton, California ~ 1 # I' 1.0. INTRODUCTION ' ' At the request of Mr Ellis Cecchim of Cecchini, Ceechini and Giovannoni, Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc (AGE) has prepared this report for field 'work performed at 3535 East 'Cherokee Road, Stockton, California, during the first quarter of 2003 The scope of work included ' installing one ground water monitoring well,conducting a quarterly ground water monitoring event and preparation of this report The site setting is illustrated in Figure 1 Strictures, monitoring well and soil boring locations are illustrated in,Figure 2 Background information was summarized in the AGE-prepared Problem Assessment Report, dated 16 August 2001 t I 3 1 , ' At the request of the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department(EHD),Cherokee Truck q q ty Stop quarterly ground water monitoring events are coordinated to occur concurrently with ground ' I water monitoring activities at the adjacent Moore Truck Lines property (3400 Newton Road) I , `I 1 lie 2.0. PROCEDURES On 24 February 2003, six ground water monitoring wells and the large on-site domestic well were ' purged and sampled Field work was performed in accordance with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) and EHD guidelines for the investigations of ' underground storage,tank (UST) sites and sampling ground water monitoring wells, respectively ' 2 1 WELL MONITORING AND EVACUATION , ' I 'a 1 1 { , On 24 February 2003, arSolinst water level,meter was°used to measure the depth'to'ground water' relative to the tops ,of the well casings in six monitoring wells in the area-of the former UST locations The ground water lelevation in wells MW-2 through,MW-6 and ground water flow direction for the site were determined from the data collected (Table 1) ' ` 1 1 I '1 After measuring ground water depths, monitoring wells UST-2 through UST-7 were purged using a Waterra inertial pump' Betweefi 6 and-14 gallons=of water were removed from wells UST-21 ' through UST-7(a minimum of three casing-water volumes per well) Groundwater was purged from j near the top,of the water column to remove water trapped within the unscreened interval of the well casings' Temperature,pH and conductivity of purged water were measured at regular intervals during purging; using an I Oak-ton water analyzer The recorded field data and logs are included in • Appendix A'Purged water was stored on-site in 55-gallon DOT-approved drums pending laboratory ' analysis I 1 Advanced GeoEnvironmental,inc r I u 1 I x l 5 I r I �