My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001943
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
3535
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544497
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001943
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 3:42:58 PM
Creation date
5/28/2019 3:25:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001943
RECORD_ID
PR0544497
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003687
FACILITY_NAME
OLD TRUCK STOP, THE
STREET_NUMBER
3535
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13206009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3535 CHEROKEE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 March 2000 ; <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0312 v <br /> iPage 5 of 6 W <br /> i32 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-d was detected in the water samples collected from UST-4 at a concentration of 59 parts per <br />' billion(ppb, reported as micrograms per liter) TPH-g, TPH-d, benzene, and toluene were detested <br /> In the water sample collected from monitoring well UST-5 at concentrations of 570 ppb, 140 ppb, <br /> 56 ppb, and 2 2 ppb, respectively Toluene and xylenesr were detected in UST-2 at concentrations <br />' of 0 66 ppb and 10 ppb,respectively Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in wells UST-3 or <br /> UST-6 <br />' Oxygenates were not detected in the water samples collected from wells UST-2 through UST-6 1,2- <br /> Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and acetone were detected in the sample collected from UST-5 at <br /> concentrations of 510 ppb and 320 ppb, respectively Other volatile organic compounds were not <br />' detected in ground water samples from the site The laboratory report (MAI sample Nos 28282 - <br /> 28286) and chain-of-custody form are included in Appendix B Analytical results of water samples <br /> collected in December 1999 are summarized on Table 2 The analytical results of all water samples <br />' are summarized on Tables 3 and 4 <br /> 3 3 MASS CALCULATIONS <br /> The average hydrocarbon concentrations of the disposed soil were 293 parts per million (ppm) of , <br />' gasoline and 2,529 ppm of diesel Approximately 141 pounds, or 23 gallons of gasoline were <br /> removed and approximately 1,219 pounds, or 174 gallons of diesel were removed <br /> 34 RESULTS OF SESOIL MODELING <br /> 1 - I <br /> With all parameters entered, using the best available data, SESOIL predicted that no contaminants <br /> would impact ground water Appendix C includes the SESOIL Input data , <br /> 1 The AT 123D model predicts chemical concentrations in ground water at a down-gradient receptor <br /> well Since no hydrocarbons were predicted to reach ground water, this section of the modeling <br /> program was not used <br /> j <br /> 4.0. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS , <br /> I t <br /> Based upon data collected from the site, AGE concludes the following <br /> • Ground water elevation Increased approximately 1 34 feet at the former USTs location <br /> " Advanced Geo Eovironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.