My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
pathways may include ingestion of, and dermal contact with, contaminated tap <br /> water and inhalation of volatile chemicals in shower stall air. <br /> • These pathways should be considered. <br /> d. The text does not explain how the lead soil PRG concentration of 130 mg/kg <br /> was calculated. <br /> • Please explain how this PRG concentration was calculated and also <br /> provide the corresponding blood lead level. <br /> C. Toxicity equivalence factors used to determine the PRGs for PAHs have not <br /> been used appropriately (Table 6-1). PRGs for PAHs, other than <br /> benzo(a)pyrene, have not been adjusted as stated in footnote h. For example, <br /> the PRG for benzo(a)anthracene should be 0.71 mg/kg not 0.071 mg/kg. <br /> • Table 6-1 should be reviewed and updated. <br /> f. The Phase 11 Data Needs section (6.4) should discuss data requirements for the <br /> baseline risk assessment. It is not possible to determine if there will be <br /> sufficient data to prepare a baseline risk assessment, given the information <br /> provided for each potential contaminant site. In sections where chemicals were <br /> detected, the frequency of detection (i.e., number of detects over the total <br /> number of samples) needs to be provided. In general, if a chemical is detected <br /> in more than 5% of the samples, it should be included in the list of chemicals <br /> of potential concern, with the possible exception of Class A carcinogens. <br /> Additionally, paragraph 6.4.2.6.1 (second sentence) should define "significant <br /> fraction." <br /> • Please discuss data requirements for the baseline risk assessment and <br /> define "significant fraction." <br /> 25. Paragraph 6.3.2.1.1, "On-Depot Receptors", Page 6-8 <br /> Although the day care center does not appear within the 66 previously identified sites, <br /> Paragraph 6.3.2.1.1 identifies the day care children as a sensitive subpopulation. UST <br /> 2 site is adjacent to this facility and high total lead is reported in the ground water. <br /> Additionally, the day care center is in the vicinity of other UST's and SWW's. If <br /> there is a possibility that previously unidentified contamination could be present at the <br /> day care center, then the soil at this facility should be analyzed. <br /> • Consider augmenting the limited surface soil database at the day care facility <br /> during Phase 11 efforts. <br /> EPA 14FEB94 9/10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.