My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corrective Action: Explain in the text that no determination of wetlands or <br /> endangered species has been made yet. Explain in the text that DDRW-Tracy will <br /> assure that the remedial action will not adversely impact wetlands or endangered <br /> species habitat should they exist. <br /> 130. Section 10.6.2 <br /> The text states that the state action level for dieldrin (0.05 ppb) "is proposed as the <br /> effluent treatment standard for OU #1. However, the ROD needs to make a definite <br /> determination for the treatment standard and not merely "propose." Further, the <br /> concentration of 0.05 ppb is inconsistent with the 0.10 µg/l stated in Section 4. <br /> Corrective Action: Delete the words "proposed as." Also, decide which concentration <br /> is the effluent treatment standard for dieldrin. <br /> 131. Section 10.6.3 <br /> The text states that OSHA requirements are "not considered to be ARARs by EPA." <br /> However, this is an oversimplification. The reason that OSHA industrial hygiene <br /> requirements are not considered to be ARAR is due to the fact that the OSHA <br /> requirements are not environmental requirements. It should be noted that by <br /> discussing OSHA requirements under this section which is entitled TBCs for this <br /> remedial action, DDRW-Tracy is committing to OSHA requirements as part of this <br /> remedial action. <br /> Corrective Action: Provide the additional explanation in the text. <br /> 132. Table 10.2.1, Federal ARARs <br /> Note: Since California is an authorized state under the RCRA program, California <br /> RCRA provisions should be cited as federal ARARs. This revision should be made <br /> throughout the federal ARARs Table. This can be done by replacing the federal <br /> section with the equivalent state section, unless, as noted by EPA comments, the <br /> initial proposed federal criteria are incorrect. <br /> a. The sub-heading "Contaminant Specific" should be revised to read: "Chemical <br /> Specific." <br /> b. National Secondary Drinking Water Standards, 40 CFR Part 143 <br /> This is not an ARAR. As acknowledged in the description section of the <br /> table, no SMCLs have been established for the chemicals of concern. <br /> Moreover, section 143.1 of Part 143 states that these regulations are not <br /> federally enforceable . Reference to this citation should be deleted. <br /> EPA/R9 June 7, 1993 29/40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.