Laserfiche WebLink
these concentrations in water supply systems. It Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 <br /> should be noted that the balancing of health effects for known human carcinogens and reproductive <br /> with technologic and economic considerations in toxins. They are found in Title 22 of CCR,Division <br /> MCLs may not be appiicable to the protection of a 2,Chapter 3. No-Significant-Risk Levels(NSRLs) <br /> raw water resource,as will be discussed later in are set at the one-in-100,000(10-5)incremental <br /> this paper. Secondary MCLS are derived from cancer risk level for carcinogens. '/1"of the No- <br /> human welfare considerations(e.g., taste,odor, Observable-Effect Level(NOEL)is used for repro- <br /> laundry staining)in the same manner as Primary ductive toxicants. Prop.65 criteria are established <br /> MCLS. in the form of a dose in units of micrograms per <br /> day of exposure(µg/d). These values are con- <br /> Drinking water MCLs are directly applicable to verted into 'lawful levels" in water by assuming 2 <br /> and enforceable by DHS on water suppliers. liters per day water consumption and 100 percent <br /> NICLs,both Primary and Secondary,are directly exposure to the chemical from drinking water,as <br /> applicable to ground and surtace water resources required by regulations contained in Title 22 of <br /> only when they are specifically referenced as water CCR,§§12721 and 12821. <br /> quality objectives in the pertinent Water Quality <br /> Control Plans. Due to their basis in health protec- 'J National Ambient Water Quality Criteria— <br /> tion, MCLS may also be used as water quality goals <br /> for other bodies of water designated as sources of These criteria are published by U.S. EPA under the <br /> drinking water in the Water Quality Control Plans. Clean Water Act to protect human health and <br /> welfare and freshwater and marine aquatic life. <br /> J Maximum Contaminant Level Goals(MCL Goals)— No-Adverse-Effect Levels are presented for non- <br /> carcinogens. Incremental cancer risk estimates for <br /> MCL Goals are promulgated by U.S.EPA under carcinogens are given at the 105, 106,and 10'(one- <br /> the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations in-ten-million)risk levels. Organoleptic levels are <br /> as the first step in establishing MCLS. By law, provided for some chemicals. Freshwater and <br /> MCL Goals must be set at levels which represent saltwater aquatic life criteria and toxicity informa- <br /> no adverse health risks. Thev are set at "zero' for tion are included. These criteria are found in: <br /> known and probable human carcinogens. 1) Quality Criteria for Water, 1986— <br /> the"Gold Book"; <br /> 7 State"Action Levels"— <br /> 2) the Ambient Water Quality Criteria volumes <br /> Action levels are published by DHS's Office of (1980,1984,1986, 1987,and 1989); <br /> Drinking Water and are based mainly on health 3) Quality Criteria for Water(1976)— <br /> effects. 106 incremental cancer risk estimates are the"Red Book";and <br /> used for carcinogens. Organoleptic(taste-and <br /> odor-based)values are also included for some 4) Water Quality Criteria, 1972— <br /> chemicals. Action levels are advisory to water the"Blue Book". <br /> suppliers. If exceeded,the supplier is urged to <br /> correct the problem or find an alternative raw 0 Health Advisories and Water Quality Advisories— <br /> water source. <br /> These advisories are published by U.S.EPA's <br /> J Proposition 65 Lawful Levels— Office of Water. Short-term(10 days or less),long- <br /> term(7 vears or less),and lifetime exposure health <br /> Proposition 65 criteria are established by the advisories for non-carcinogens and suspected <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency(Cal/ human carcinogens are included where data <br /> EPA),Office of Environmental Health Hazard sufficient for derivation of the advisories exist. <br /> Assessment(OEHHA)under the California Safe Incremental cancer risk estimates for known and <br /> Page 6 California's Water Quality Standards <br />