My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EPA COMMENTS ON THE <br /> MINUTES OF THE PROJECT MANAGER MEETING OF <br /> JANUARY 13-14, 1993 <br /> 1. DDRW-Tracy RI/FS FFA Schedule Approval <br /> The minutes would more accurately reflect the discussions if the third sentence read <br /> "EPA requested that the Baseline Risk Assessment (BAR) Work Plan provide more detail <br /> on how the risk assessment will be performed. <br /> • Please revise the minutes accordingly. <br /> 2. DDRW-Tracy RI/FS FFA Schedule Approval <br /> The third to the last sentence states "CoE will review and address EPA's comments, <br /> through correspondence, on the BRA Work Plan." However,EPA does not recall that <br /> there was a conclusion that EPA comments would be addressed through correspondence. <br /> [Note: In a subsequent conversation between CoE and EPA,CoE requested clarification <br /> from EPA that the risk assessment comments were expected to be addressed in the Work <br /> Plan rather than through a separate response.] <br /> • Please delete the words "through correspondence." <br /> 3. DDRW-Tracy RI/FS FFA Schedule Approval <br /> The second to the last sentence states"They will develop generic pathways that are not <br /> site specific to DDRW-Tracy." However, at the meeting EPA emphasized that while <br /> SWMU-specific information is not yet conclusive, the preliminary pathways should be <br /> appropriate for what is currently known about contamination at DDRW-Tracy. <br /> • Please revise the sentence accordingly. <br /> 4. Review of IRM Status <br /> The text suggests that obtaining a NPDES permit to discharge temporarily to an <br /> irrigation canal was "the least favorable." <br /> • Please explain in the minutes why this is the least favorable. <br /> 5. Format for Quarterly and Annual Monitoring Reports <br /> In regard to a more efficient reporting format the fourth sentence states "EPA agreed <br /> with RWQCB and stated they would be interested in seeing JMM format." EPA agreed <br /> with the RWQCB that the format could be made more efficient. EPA did not <br /> necessarily agree that the DDRW-Tracy format should be similar to DDRW-Sharpe <br /> reports. [Format options should be considered in the conference call which is to be <br /> scheduled.] <br /> • Please revise the text to reflect that EPA agreed with the RWQCB that the <br /> format can be made more efficient. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.