My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• i <br /> needed to calculate PBGs. A list of expected contaminants <br /> for which no toxicity information is readily available <br /> through the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) or the <br /> Health Effects Summary Tables (HEAST) should be submitted at <br /> this time, to allow adequate time for toxicity values to be <br /> developed for the BRA. Human health risk at ARARs is <br /> calculated using AKAR concentrations as exposure point <br /> concentrations in risk equations, using standard default <br /> exposure factors. PRGs can be calculated for each <br /> contaminant by using a rearrangement of the same equations. <br /> The results of the PBGs should be summarized in a tabular <br /> format. An example of PRGs for water and their comparison <br /> to reported analytical detection limits is provided in Table <br /> 1. (Note that some of these detection limits are grossly <br /> inadequate. ) <br /> 2 . The BRA Work Plan for the Comprehensive RI/FS (May 1992) <br /> intends to "utilize and incorporate" information from the <br /> BRA for Operable Unit #1 (OU #1) . However, DDRW-Tracy <br /> should not use this information to limit the investigation <br /> of chemicals of potential concern and exposure pathways. <br /> 3 . A list of chemicals of potential concern (approximately 30) , <br /> are prematurely used as the starting point for the selection <br /> of chemicals of concern. The list of chemicals of potential <br /> concern should include all chemicals that are analyzed for C— <br /> during the Phase I sampling (Appendix A: Field Sampling <br /> Plan) . There exists no rationale at this point for limiting <br /> potential chemicals of concern. <br /> ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC COMMENTS <br /> 1. Page 4-1, Section 4 . 0, Heading <br /> This heading should read "Baseline Risk Assessment" rather <br /> than "Risk Assessment. " EPA suggests "baseline risk <br /> assessment" be used in place of "risk assessment. " <br /> 2 . Page 4-1, Section 4 . 1. 1, Paragraph 1. Sentence 2 <br /> This sentence should read "the objective of the BRA is to <br /> evaluate actual and future risk to human health and the <br /> environment posed by DDRW-Tracy in the absence of remedial <br /> action. " <br /> 3. Page 4-1, Section 4 . 1.2 , Paragraph 2 <br /> The BRA does not determine remedial action goals nor <br /> acceptable risk, but rather it presents an objective <br /> analysis of the actual and potential risks to human health <br /> and the environment posed by DDRW-Tracy. <br /> II-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.