My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUMMARY OF REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES <br /> The OU #1 groundwater FS for DDRW-Tracy was presented to EPA in October 1992. <br /> DDRW-Tracy, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), <br /> California's Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and EPA have evaluated four <br /> alternatives for groundwater cleanup at DDRW-Tracy. These four alternatives are discussed <br /> below. <br /> TCE and PCE are the target chemicals of concern to be cleaned up. Other volatile organics <br /> such as 1,1-dichloroethene, carbon tetrachloride, and chloroform will be cleaned up along <br /> with the TCE and PCE. Inorganics) ound at elevated concentrations in the OU #1 plume <br /> such as boron and nitrate nd pesticides)such as dieldrin are no believed to have on-site <br /> sources. However, groundwater extracted for treatment may have to be pre-treated for one <br /> or more of these compoundsio prevent damage to the treatment system and impacts on the <br /> reinjection aquifer groundwater quality. IFprostrtl to wfl;64 1 high Wnces?fhahmis� <br /> Alternative 1, termed "no-action," consists of no physical cleanup, but monitors the <br /> groundwater plume using about 30 existing on-site and off-site monitoring wells. <br /> Consideration of the "no action" remedial alternative is required by the National Oil and <br /> Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). It also serves as a reference for <br /> comparison of the cost and non-cost characteristics of the other remedial alternatives. This <br /> alternative would be implemented for 30 years. The estimated costs are shown below: <br /> Monitoring Costs $1,734,300 <br /> Capital Costs 0 <br /> Annual Operations and Maintenance 0 <br /> (O&M) Costs <br /> Present Worth Cost for 30 years $1,734,300 <br /> "Present-worth cost" is the amount of money that, if invested now, would cover all the <br /> estimated costs of the proposed alternative. <br /> Alternative 2, termed "Institutional Controls," consists of no physical cleanup but prohibits <br /> the drilling of off-site shallow wells downgradient of DDRW-Tracy in the area presently <br /> Q190,7063.1(90390C)\10 10 M1007922139 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.