Laserfiche WebLink
University of California <br /> Lawrence Livermore l] National Laboratory <br /> Ground -Water -Project- <br /> Proposed Cleanu Plan ' <br /> This document was prepared by LLNL and the U S Department of Energy,with oversight by the U.S.Environmental <br /> Protection Agency;California Environmental Protection Agency,Department of Toxic Substances Control;and the <br /> Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board October 1991 <br /> LLNL Proposes Cleanup Plan for Contaminated Opportunities For <br /> Ground Water and Soil Community Involvement <br /> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)and the U.S.Depart- Community Meeting <br /> ment of Energy (DOE),along with other State and Federal agencies,are You are encouraged to attend a <br /> requesting public comments on the preferred cleanup plan for ground water meeting on Wednesday,Novem- <br /> and soil contamination at LLNL's Livermore site(Figure 1). ber 6, 1991 at 7 p.m.at the Liver- <br /> The preferred method for cleaning up the contaminated ground water is to: more High School's Student <br /> Union Building.The address is <br /> ■ Extract ground water at about 18 locations throughout the contaminated <br /> area and at the contamination sources. The water would then be treated on- 600 Maple Street in Livermore. <br /> site at a total of seven facilities that use either ultraviolet light/hydrogen peroxi- The purpose of the meeting will <br /> dation or air stripping technology (see explanation on pages 6 and 7). be to discuss the cleanup alterna- <br /> For contaminated soils tives under consideration for the <br /> LLNL Livermore site,hear concerns, <br /> Dub In above the ground water and receive oral and written public <br /> a (unsaturated zone), the comments.Representatives from <br /> e B <br /> Pleasan on ■ d Preferred cleanu P LLNL;DOE;the U.S.Environmental <br /> Livermore method is to: <br /> East Ave ■ Extract the contami- Protection Agency(EPA);the Cali- <br /> Teals Road nant vapors using vacu- fornia Environmental Protection <br /> & um-induced venting. The Agency,Department of Toxic Sub- <br /> vapors would then be stances Control;and the San Francis- <br /> `A- Uwnnon She Study Aro 2 destroyed by catalytic co Bay Area Regional Water Quality <br /> oxidation (see page 7). Control Board(RWQCB)will be <br /> Figure 1. Location of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. available to answer your questions. <br /> The proposed cleanup <br /> plan is more completely described in a document called the Proposed Remedial Public Review and Comment <br /> Action Plan(PRAP). Copies are available at the information repositories listed Period <br /> on the back page of this fact sheet. The Administrative Record,which contains (October 18—November 18,1991) <br /> all of the documents that will be used to select a cleanup remedy,is located in A 30-day public review and com- <br /> the LLNL Visitors Center(see back page for address). ment period on the Proposed Remedi- <br /> A final cleanup plan will be selected al Action Plan and Administrative <br /> What's Inside after the public has had an opportunity Record begins on Friday,October 18, <br /> Site Background.......... to comment on all alternatives that 1991.All interested members of the <br /> ks..........................2 <br /> Summary of Health Risks..........................3 Fere considered for the LLNL site. public are encouraged to review <br /> Tritium..........................................................3 Thus,the preferred alternative may and comment not only on the pre- <br /> Evaluation of Cleanup change in response to public com- ferred alternative,but on all of the <br /> Alternatives.................................................4 ments or new site information. cleanup options considered.You <br /> Description of Extraction and can submit your comments either <br /> Treatment Technologies.............................6 The purpose of this fact sheet is to orally(at the community meeting) <br /> Why These Alternatives are Preferred ...8 summarize the PRAP and explain how ' <br /> Next Steps....................................................8 P or in writing.Written comments <br /> Evaluation Criteria.....................................9 you can comment on the Plan. ` may be sent to John Ziagos,LLNL's <br /> For More information..............................10 Acting Ground Water Project Lead- <br /> UCAR-10280.91-2 er,at the address listed on the back <br /> page of this fact sheet.Written com- <br /> ments should be postmarked no <br /> later than November 18,1991. <br />