My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> Nine EPA Evaluation Criteria <br /> Each alternative was assessed against the nine 5. Reduction of Toxicity, <br /> EPA evaluation criteria described below. Using Mobility and Volume <br /> results of this assessment,LLNL compared the Through Treatment: <br /> alternatives and selected a preferred alternative Refers to the anticipated <br /> for the site. The nine criteria are summarized ability of a remedy to <br /> below: reduce the toxicity, <br /> mobility and volume of <br /> 1. Overall Protection of Human the hazardous compo- <br /> Health and the Environment: nents present at the site. <br /> Addresses whether or not a <br /> remedy provides adequate <br /> protection and describes how <br /> risks posed through each path- 6. Implementability: <br /> way are eliminated,reduced or controlled Refers to the technical ® GD <br /> through treatment,engineering controls or administrative feasibility <br /> institutional controls. of a remedy,including <br /> the availability of materi- <br /> als and services needed <br /> to carry out a particular <br /> 2. Compliance with Applica- option. <br /> ble or Relevant and Appro- IL <br /> priate Requirements(ARARs): Addresses <br /> whether or not a remedy 7. Cost: Evaluates the <br /> will meet all ARARs of Federal and State envi- estimated capital and <br /> ronmental statutes and/or provide grounds operation and mainte- <br /> for invoking a waiver. nance costs of each <br /> alterative. <br /> 3. Long-term Effectiveness <br /> and Permanence: Refers 2QA0 S. State Acceptance: Indicates <br /> to the ability of a remedy 2000 whether,based on its review <br /> to maintain reliable protec- of the information,the State <br /> tion of human health and 1990 concurs with,opposes or <br /> the environment over has no comment on the pre- OK <br /> time,once cleanup goals ferred alternatives. <br /> have been met. <br /> LLLLLLLJ <br /> 9. Community Acceptance: <br /> 4. Short-term Effectiveness: Indicates whether com- <br /> Addresses the period of time munity concerns are HH <br /> needed to complete the rem- addressed by the remedy <br /> edy,and any adverse impact and whether or not the. <br /> on human health and the community has a prefer- 6{ <br /> environment that may be ence for a remedy. <br /> posed during the construction and Although public comment is an important <br /> implementation period. part of the final decision,EPA is compelled <br /> by law to balance community concerns with <br /> all of the previously mentioned criteria. <br /> Figure 7. The nine EPA evaluation criteria. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.