Laserfiche WebLink
carry-out further investigation. <br /> To summarize what is known in regards to water quality <br /> conditions in recently abandoned Well 1: <br /> • Well 1 was only screened in the Lower Tulare. <br /> • Analytical results of Well 1 groundwater samples <br /> detected significant levels of 4, 4 '-DDD, 4 , 4 ' -DDE, and <br /> dieldrin. Results can not be verified by resampling <br /> because Well 1 has been abandoned. <br /> • Monitoring wells surrounding Well 1 but screened in the <br /> Upper Tulare (LM 42 , LM 24, LM 25, LM 85) have not <br /> detected organochlorine pesticides in groundwater <br /> samples. <br /> Even if the Upper Tulare were contaminated with <br /> organochlorine pesticides, it is unlikely that Well 1 could have <br /> drawn pesticides down through 105 feet of Corcoran clay during <br /> its operational lifetime. Many factors could have led to the <br /> detection of 4 , 4 ' -DDD, 4, 4 ' -DDE, dieldrin in groundwater samples <br /> from Well 1. These factors include: <br /> 1) materials introduced into the well during original well <br /> closure activities, <br /> 2) leaching of chemicals from the clay, sand, and wood debris <br /> used to backfill the well, <br /> 3) field contamination during this investigation, <br /> 4) point source pesticide contamination drawn down from upper <br /> horizons through the Corcoran clay (This factor is unlikely <br /> for reasons stated above) , and <br /> 5) a regional low concentration pesticide plume as suggested by <br /> a letter from the RWQCB dated October 5, 1992 . <br /> Analytical results from Well 4 , believed to be perforated in <br /> the Upper Tulare and in the Lower Tulare, and Well 7, believed to <br /> be perforated at least in the Lower Tulare, have not detected <br /> organochlorine pesticides during this sampling event or during a <br /> sampling event conducted in April 1992 . <br /> SPECIFIC COMMENTS <br /> 1. Section 3 , Figure 3-1 <br /> Figure 3-1 is the Well Abandonment Log for Well 1. Nowhere <br /> on the log is it indicated that this is a well abandonment <br /> log. To dispel any confusion in the future, it is <br /> recommended that the log be identified as a well abandonment <br /> log. <br /> 2 <br />