My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Well Monitoring Program -2- 11 September 1992 <br /> DDRW, Tracy <br /> Screen Interval Screen Interval to Ground Water <br /> Well (Feet bgs) Upper Horizon Elevation (Feet msl ) <br /> LM-5 20-30 Above 55.50 <br /> LM-31 36.5-46.5 In 55.41 <br /> LM-32 18-28 Above 55.22 <br /> LM-33 49-59 In 55.16 <br /> LM-58 20-30 Above 54.70 <br /> LM-59 46-56 In 54.67 <br /> Because both sets of wells hydraulically appear to be in the same water bearing <br /> zone, all of the data should be used to accurately assess the extent of the ground <br /> water contamination. This concept should also be extended to the composite wells <br /> (screened in the lower part of the upper horizon and the upper part of the middle <br /> horizon) and for the wells screened below the lower horizon, provided there are no <br /> significant head differences. <br /> I am specifically concerned that the extent of the trichloroethylene (TCE) and <br /> tetrachloroethylene (PCE) plumes for the upper horizon is more extensive than is <br /> depicted in Figures 3-1 and 3-2. Based on the data from wells screened above the <br /> upper horizon, the extent of the plume boundaries for the upper horizon should be <br /> expanded to include LM-32 and LM-58. As presented in these figures, these wells are <br /> outside of the plume boundaries. The TCE and PCE concentrations ranged from 41 to <br /> 75.8 micrograms per liter (µg/1 ) and 85 to 215 µg/1 , respectively, in LM-32 and <br /> from 11 to 21 µg/l and 10 to 24.8 µg/1 , respectively, in LM-58. Because <br /> concentrations of TCE and PCE were not detected in samples from LM-43, this <br /> indicates that there may be a source area near LM-32. In addition, high TCE and PCE <br /> concentrations (31 to 51.5 µg/l and 295 to 457 µg/1 , respectively) in samples from <br /> LM-30 also indicate a source area near this well . <br /> Some of the highest concentrations for TCE, PCE and total volatile hydrocarbons from <br /> the soil gas survey, were measured in SV137, SV147 and SV149 (Table 2.2-1 of the <br /> Comprehensive RI/FS Work Plan) which are in the same area as LM-32 and LM-58, and in <br /> SV115 and SV121 which are near LM-30. The soil gas data and ground water data from <br /> wells screened above the upper horizon indicate that the majority of the <br /> contamination, specifically for PCE, may be in the unsaturated zone and the <br /> uppermost ground water. These data also indicate that an extraction well (s) may be <br /> needed in the areas of LM-30 and LM-32 (currently depicted outside of the plume <br /> boundaries) and that a vapor extraction system may be appropriate for remediation of <br /> the unsaturated zone in these two areas. <br /> Recommendations for Well Monitoring. Many of the recommendations for on-going <br /> monitoring in the Draft Report appear to be excessive. Based on the data collected <br /> in the first four consecutive and comprehensive quarters, TCE and PCE still appear <br /> to be the primary ground water contaminants. Contamination by pesticides and metals <br /> appears to be limited to specific waste disposal areas. On-going monitoring for <br /> pesticides and metals in the majority of the monitor wells appears to be unnecessary <br /> at this time. Until the site-wide RI is conducted for all waste management unit <br /> (WMU) and underground storage tank (UST) potential source areas, the ground water <br /> monitoring program should be limited in scope and should only continue in areas <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.