Laserfiche WebLink
Well Monitoring Program -6- 11 September 1992 <br /> DDRW, Tracy <br /> cluster sites are recommended for quarterly monitoring. Tracy should <br /> consider reducing the monitoring frequency of well cluster LM-49, LM-50 and <br /> LM-51 to a semi-annual basis. <br /> c. If it is determined that the elevated metals concentrations are associated <br /> with turbidity in the older wells, then LM-85 may need to be substituted <br /> for LM-25 for quarterly monitoring. Presently, LM-85 is only recommended <br /> for annual monitoring. <br /> d. It is unclear why the heavy metals analyzed using the Inductively Coupled <br /> Plasma (ICP) Method were primarily recommended for quarterly monitoring <br /> whereas, metals analyzed by Atomic Absorption (AA) were recommended for <br /> annual monitoring. The laboratory method should not determine the <br /> monitoring frequency. When a well is initially installed and ground water <br /> contamination by metals is suspected, analysis for all metals (Title 22 <br /> metals, for a total of 17) should be performed for one or two quarters, at <br /> a minimum. <br /> 3. Table 2-1 is a construction summary for monitor wells LM-1 to LM-92. This <br /> table has been extremely useful in the review of this Report and Woodward-Clyde <br /> should be commended for the preparation and presentation of this table. The <br /> table may be improved, however, if it were to be expanded to include on-site <br /> supply wells (both operational and abandoned) and the IRM wells, which would <br /> include the extraction and injection performance monitor wells. <br /> 4. The base well map needs to be revised to reflect the new numbering system for <br /> the IRM wells (LM-200 series) , and needs to depict the location of all wells <br /> including the on-site supply wells. <br /> 5. The Draft Report did not include concentration versus time graphs for any of <br /> the monitor wells sampled during the four quarters. These graphs should be <br /> constructed to depict the changes in concentrations for TCE and PCE over time. <br /> These graphs may not be necessary for all of the monitor wells but for selected <br /> wells. All historical sampling events (not just the four quarters summarized <br /> in this Report) should be recorded on the graphs. These graphs will help to <br /> understand the dynamics of the plume and should be compared to the hydrographs <br /> to determine if contaminant concentrations trends are affected by the <br /> hydraulics of the ground water system. <br /> 6. It is unclear why <1 µg/l was reported in the Table 3-7 instead of <0.5 µg/l . <br /> The higher limit does not appear to be related to matrix or other VOC <br /> contaminant interferences. It is assumed that 1 Ag/l is the Practical <br /> Quantitation Limit (PQL) rather than the detection limit. <br /> 7. Section 4.1.1 states that five up gradient domestic background wells were <br /> selected and sampled to establish background levels of contamination. Two of <br /> these wells may be affected by an off-site source and therefore would not meet <br /> one of the selection criteria (page 3-3 of the November 1991 Monitoring <br /> Report) . The Final Report should be revised to state that these wells were <br /> specifically selected to establish background for the OU-I Risk Assessment. <br />