My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
YUHLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE <br /> i'—IRONMENTAL RESPONSE 42 USCS § 9621 <br /> (D) the remedial action selected will attain a standard of performance <br /> that is equivalent to that required under the otherwise applicable i (C) State concurrence in deleting sites from the National Priorities <br /> standard, requirement, criteria, or limitation, through use of another List. <br /> method or approach; (D) State participation in the long-term planning process for all <br /> with res remedial sites within the State. <br /> do ate to a State standard, requirement criteria ra td ta- (E) A reasonable opportunity for States to review and comment on <br /> tion, the State has not consistently applied (or demonstrated the <br /> intention to consistently apply) the standard, requirement, criteria, or " each of the following: <br /> limitation in similar circumstances at other remedial actions within (i) The remedial investigation and'feasibility study and all data and <br /> the State; or technical documents leading to its issuance. <br /> (F) in the case of a remedial action to be undertaken solely under (ii) The planned remedial action identified in the remedial investi- <br /> gation and feasibility study. <br /> section 104 [42 USCS § 96041 using the Fund, selection of a remedial (iii) The engineering design following selection of the final remedial <br /> action that attains such level or standard of control will not provide a <br /> balance between the need for protection of public health and welfare action. <br /> (iv) Other technical data and reports relating to implementation of <br /> and the environment at the facility under consideration, and the <br /> availability of amounts from the Fund to respond to other sites which the remedy. <br /> • present or may present a threat to public health or welfare or the (v) Any proposed finding or decision by the President to exercise <br /> environment, taking into consideration the relative immediacy of such the authority of subsection (d)(4). <br /> threats. (F) Notice to the State of negotiations with potentially responsible <br /> The President shall publish such findings, together with an explanation s parties regarding the scope of any response action at a facility in the <br /> and appropriate documentation. p State and an opportunity to participate in such negotiations and, <br /> subject to paragraph (2), be a party to any settlement. <br /> (e) Permits and enforcement. (1) No Federal, State, or local permit shall be (G) Notice to the State and an opportunity to comment or the <br /> required for the portion of any removal or remedial-action conducted <br /> 7r,:, President s proposed plan for remedial action as well 85 on alternative <br /> entirely onsite, where such remedial action is selected and carried out in plans under consideration. The President's proposed decision regard- <br /> compliance with this section. ing the selection of remedial action shall be accompanied by a <br /> (2) A State may enforce any Federal or State standard, requirement, response to the comments submitted by the State, including an <br /> criteria, or limitation to which the remedial action is required to explanation regarding any decision under subsection (d)(4) on compli- <br /> conform under this Act in the United States district court for the ance with promulgated State standards. A copy of such response shall <br /> district in which the facility is located. Any consent decree shall require „ also be provided to the State. <br /> the parties to attempt expeditiously to resolve disagreements concerning - (I;) Prompt notice and explanation of each proposed action to the <br /> implementation of the remedial action informally with the appropriate State in which the facility is located. <br /> Federal and State agencies. Where the parties agree, the consent decree F <br /> may provide for administrative enforcement. Each consent decree shall Prior to the promulgation of such regulations, the President shall <br /> Iso contain stipulated penalties for violations of the decree in an provide notice to the State of negotiations with potentially responsible <br /> amount not to exceed $25,000 r day, which may be enforced b either R parses regarding the scope of any response action at a facility in the <br /> pe Y Y Y State, and such State may participate in such negotiations and, subject <br /> construed to impair <br /> the President the State. Such stipulated penalties shall not order <br /> to paragraph (2), any settlements. <br /> pair affect the authority c ree.the court to order (2XA) This paragraph shall apply to remedial actions secured under <br /> compliance with the specific terms of any such decree. _' section 106 [42 USCS § 9606]. At least 30 days prior to the entering <br /> (f) State involvement. (1) The President shallromul ate regulations I of any consent decree, if the President proposes to select a remedial <br /> providing for substantial and meaningful involvement by each State in "'! action that does not attain a legally applicable or relevant and <br /> initiation, development, and selection of remedial actions to be under- t_ appropriate standard, requirement, criteria, or limitation, under the <br /> taken in that State. The regulations, at a minimum, shall include each of M w authority of subsection (d)(4), the President shall provide an opportu- <br /> the following: nity for the State to concur or not concur in such selection. If the <br /> (A) State involvement in decisions whether to perform a preliminary State concurs, the State may become a signatory to the consent <br /> assessment and site inspection. _ decree. <br /> (B) Allocation of responsibility for hazard ranking system scoring. (B) If the State does not concur in-such selection, and the State <br /> 406 desires to have the remedial-action conform to such standard, require- <br /> 407 <br /> s <br /> , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.