My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Identification. " <br /> Specific Comment 4 <br /> Adequate references should be provided to determine the extent of <br /> the area releasing volatiles. From responses provided by DDRW- <br /> Tracy, we cannot determine where the values for area come from. <br /> It would also be helpful if a sample calculation was provided to <br /> better illustrate the methodology. <br /> Specific Comment 6 <br /> In addition to our comment above in General Comment 1, our <br /> concerns about fugitive dusts are over those smaller, unpaved <br /> areas and any other exposed SWMUs on the site. <br /> Specific Comment 16 <br /> It would still be helpful if the report mentions that 20 minutes <br /> is equivalent to 0. 33 hours/day. <br /> Specific Comment 20 <br /> Even though values will be presented in the Comprehensive RI/FS <br /> report, they still need to be presented in the OU No. l risk <br /> assessment in a clear manner. Specific concerns are that <br /> factors, especially absorption factors, be adequately defined. A <br /> table showing all relevant exposure parameters (e.g. , soil <br /> ingestion rates for the Comprehensive RI/FS, absorption factors) <br /> would help to present these more clearly for both exposure <br /> scenarios. <br /> II-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.