Laserfiche WebLink
(DHS) . Conversely, some have experienced marked decreases. <br /> Percentaget <br /> Well No. Parameter Increase/ (Decrease) <br /> LM-25 TCE (213) <br /> LM-963 TCE (670) <br /> LM-35 PCE 88 <br /> LM-41 TCE 79 <br /> LM-55 PCE 67 <br /> LM-62 TCE 137 <br /> PCE 256 <br /> LM-66 PCE 85 <br /> LM-70 TCE 92 <br /> tMay 1991 versus last reported analytical result. <br /> *Duplicate sample of LM-25. <br /> • In the final report, DDRW-Tracy should explain these <br /> changes in relation to the historical contamination <br /> around these wells, plume configuration and plume <br /> movement. <br /> 10. Because this is the first of many quarters of quarterly <br /> groundwater monitoring prudence would dictate a more <br /> comprehensive suite of chemicals be analyzed for. This <br /> would provide a firm foundation for a thorough site <br /> characterization and remediation. As an example, analyses <br /> for acetone and organophosphate pesticides, among others, <br /> have been limited to select wells or not performed at all. <br /> Consequently, it cannot be stated with any degree of <br /> certainty that these chemical constituents are not present <br /> throughout DDRW-Tracy. <br /> A skewed picture of the overall extent of contamination <br /> could result from limited chemical analyses. Because DDRW- <br /> Tracy is an uncontrolled hazardous waste site, a thorough <br /> assessment of the hazardous substances potentially present <br /> should be performed. This would involve analyzing for <br /> chemicals on the Target Compound List (TCL) , Target Analyte <br /> List (TAL) , as well as Dioxins and Tentatively Identified <br /> Compounds (TLCs) . (Dioxins are to be analytes of concern <br /> for some of the solid waste management unit investigations. ) <br /> • DDRW-Tracy will propose an interim sampling plan (to be <br /> followed by a formal plan, as was discussed at the <br /> Project Manager Meeting of October 11, 1991) , <br /> delineating parameters and locations for EPA and State <br /> review. <br /> 5 <br />