My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t MEMORANDUM • <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Phone: (916) 361-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 ATSS Phone: 8-495-5600 <br /> TO: Antonia K. J. Vorster� FROM: Camilla Williams <br /> Senior WRC Engineer Engineering Geologist <br /> DATE: 23 August 1991 SIGNATURE: N ���� � <br /> SUBJECT: REVIEW OF INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIATION PLAN FOR THE NEW SUBSISTENCE <br /> WAREHOUSE, DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION REGION WEST (DDRW), TRACY, SAN JOAQUIN <br /> COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the Investigation and Remediation Plan for the subsistence warehouse <br /> excavation at the south end of the DDRW, Tracy site. Due to the time critical nature <br /> of this investigation, in that, the DDRW, Tracy will pay penalties to the construction <br /> contractor for delays in the schedule, I have agreed to expedite my review of this <br /> document. I provided my verbal comments to Mr. Marshall Cloud in a telephone <br /> conversation earlier today. My comments and concerns are summarized below. <br /> 1 . The document needs to be revised to reflect the name change for the Department of <br /> Health Services to the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) . <br /> 2. Page 3. Section 1.4 indicates that the warehouse is approximately 270 feet by 250 <br /> feet. However, the excavation is larger than the area of the warehouse and <br /> therefore, the size of the warehouse excavation needs to be referenced. I had been <br /> previously informed that the size of the excavation was approximately 900 beet by <br /> 400 feet. The size of the area of concern needs to be clarified. <br /> 3. Page 4. Section 2.0 states the objectives of the investigation. The objectives <br /> are incomplete because protection of water quality is not listed as an objective. <br /> One the warehouse is constructed, additional remediation of the subsoils to protect <br /> ground water would be difficult. Tracy needs to consider that the beneficial uses <br /> of the ground water (which potentially could have/had been impacted by the wastes <br /> discovered in the excavation) include more than just a potential source of drinking <br /> water. The beneficial uses of the ground water include domestic, municipal , <br /> industrial and agricultural supply and are listed in Finding No. 12 of Waste <br /> Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Order No. 90-275. <br /> 4. Page 8. Section 3.4 indicates that a minimum of 1267 cubic yards (cy) of <br /> contaminated soil must be excavated. It is unknown how this amount was determined. <br /> In addition, 1267 cy of excavated soil may not be an adequate amount of soil as a <br /> removal action to protect water quality. Depending on the concentrations of <br /> potential contaminants in the subsoils, Tracy may need to excavate more than <br /> 1267 cy of contaminated soil . <br /> 5. Page 8. Section 3.5 indicates that the drums are to be sampled in-place prior to <br /> removal from the excavation. In a telephone conference call on 13 August 1991 <br /> between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) , the OTSC, the Regional Board and <br /> Tracy, it was agreed that the drums and other potential hot spots could be removed <br /> for sampling on a non-time critical basis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.