Laserfiche WebLink
{ <br /> Mr. Maurice Benson - 2 - 30 December 2011 <br /> Defense Logistics Agency <br /> samples from soil borings located at the south, east, and north sides of the UST excavation <br /> area and performed laboratory chemical analyses. The maximum concentration of TPH was <br /> 17,000 mg/kg in soil and 650,000 µg/L in groundwater. <br /> In October 2003, DLA submitted the Final DDJC-Tracy UST Program Preferred Alternatives <br /> Report(PAR). The PAR presented soil and groundwater sampling results for 13 UST sites at <br /> the Tracy supply depot. The PAR recommended closure for 12 of the sites, and monitored <br /> natural attenuation for the Building 255 UST site. The PAR presented chemical analyses <br /> results on a soil sample collected from 15 feet below the surface at the former UST location <br /> and a groundwater sample collected approximately 30 feet north. The TPH concentration in <br /> the soil sample was 16,000 mg/kg and in the water sample was 20,000 µg/L. At that time, <br /> DLA estimated that approximately 400 cubic yards of soil contaminated with approximately <br /> 200 kilograms of TPH remained in soil beneath the former UST. Also, DLA estimated that the <br /> plume of contamination was over 24,000 square feet with a portion of the plume beneath the <br /> building. The PAR determined that the Building 255 site was a low risk site, but due to the <br /> TPH concentrations in soil and groundwater, the site should be monitored. The PAR <br /> recommended that the site be monitored for an additional year; soil borings would be <br /> advanced, and soil and groundwater samples collected and analyzed to verify decreasing <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations before the site is recommended for closure. <br /> In January 2009, DLA again collected soil and groundwater samples from borings at and near <br /> the former UST location. The maximum concentration of TPH was 7,200 mg/kg in soil and <br /> 720,000 µg/L in groundwater. In February 2010, DLA collected groundwater samples from soil <br /> borings. The maximum concentration of TPH was 619,000 µg/L. In May 2010, DLA installed <br /> five groundwater monitoring wells LM198AU through LM202AU, screened across the water <br /> table. Laboratory chemical analyses results on groundwater samples collected during the <br /> second, third, and fourth quarters of 2010 using low-flow techniques detected TPH at <br /> concentrations up to 1,150 µg/L. <br /> In August 2010, DLA performed vapor intrusion modeling using the Johnson and Ettinger <br /> Model to estimate health risks resulting from potential migration of TPH volatile organic <br /> constituent (VOC) vapor into Building 255. On 16 August 2010, DLA submitted a draft <br /> modeling report, and following the 5 April 2011 Central Valley Water Board staff review letter, <br /> submitted the Modeling Report dated 4 June 2011. Both reports indicated that the excess <br /> cancer risk from volatilization and intrusion of TPH VOCs into Building 255 indoor air was less <br /> than 1x10-6. However, the hazard quotient reported in the Draft 16 August 2010 Modeling <br /> Report was 1.47, whereas the hazard quotient in the Draft/Final 4 June 2011 Modeling Report <br /> was less than 1.0. <br /> Modeling Report Comments <br /> 1) In the Modeling Report, DLA changed the model input parameters, and resulting excess <br /> cancer risk and hazard quotient modeling results that were presented in the draft modeling <br /> report. The reasons for these changes were not presented in the Modeling Report, and <br /> were not requested in the 5 April 2011 Central Valley Water Board staff review letter. <br /> Changes to the modeling must be justified in a revised Modeling Report, which must also <br /> include changes made to comply with other requirements described below. If changes are <br /> not justified, another phase of data collection and risk evaluation may be necessary. <br />