Laserfiche WebLink
ls,0so�„fs UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY <br /> p v� Region 9 <br /> 9 y 75 Hawthorne Street <br /> %7 n7? San Francisco CA 94105-3901 <br /> t <br /> May 18 , 2000 Q <br /> Mr. Ronald Allen <br /> Sharpe Site Project Manager <br /> Environmental Protection Office <br /> DD-Sharpe i <br /> P.O. Box 960001 <br /> Stockton, CA 95296-0250 <br /> RE: EFA Schedule Compliance <br /> Dear Mr. Allen, <br /> As has been discussed between you and Michael Work of my <br /> staff, the Defense Logistics Agency has not submitted a primary <br /> document (Draft Final Remedial Action Report NFA Sites) per the <br /> terms of the Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) Schedule. This <br /> schedule was provided to EPA at the RPM meeting of April 12, <br /> 2000 . According to the terms of the FFA, DLA is to request <br /> modifications to any FFA schedule in writing prior to deadline. <br /> Further, such a request is to include the timetable, deadline or <br /> schedule that is sought to be extended, the length of the <br /> extension sought, the extent to which any related deadline would <br /> be affected, and the "good cause" basis for the extension per FFA <br /> Section 9 .2 . <br /> As of this writing, EPA has not received written <br /> notification of any request for extension. The deadline of <br /> August 30, 1999, for the Draft Final Remedial Action Report NFA <br /> Sites remains unchanged; thus, it would appear that DLA is out of <br /> compliance with the FFA schedule and potentially vulnerable to <br /> enforcement action, which may include an assessment of stipulated <br /> penalties . <br />