Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF CALIFORNIA•Environmental Protecti0noency • PETE WILSON,Governor <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road,Suite A -- <br /> Sacramento,CA 95827-3098 <br /> PHONE:(916)2553000 <br /> FAX:(916)2553015 <br /> 19 December 1996 <br /> Mr. Jim Pinasco <br /> Department of Toxic Substances Control <br /> 10151 Croydon Way, Suite 3 <br /> Sacramento, Ca 95827-2106 <br /> OPERABLE UNIT 2 PRE-DESIGN TECHNICAL SUMMARY, DDRW-SHARPE, SAN JOAQUIN <br /> COUNTY <br /> We have reviewed the Operable Unit Pre-Design Technical Summary, dated October 1996, for the <br /> DDRW-Sharpe facility. The purpose of this report was to present the results of additional field work <br /> conducted to verify how these results correlated with previous findings, and develop remedial designs as <br /> required by the Final Basewide Record of Decision for Operable Unit 2 (OU2 ROD) at the DDRW- <br /> Sharpe site. The field work consisted of soil vapor surveys and soil sampling for metals contamination. <br /> We commend Sharpe and its consultants on a good effort to collect useful data in the field. <br /> We have four general concerns with the Pre-Design Technical Summary. The first concerns is we <br /> believe that the OU2 ROD requires that the soil gas data collected as part of this report are to be <br /> evaluated to determine the potential impacts to water quality, not the technical and economic analysis <br /> for volatile organic contaminant(VOC) cleanup as presented. Secondly, the Pre-Design Technical <br /> Summary, which has been considered a secondary document, does not appear to be the appropriate <br /> document for closing sites with no further action when the ROD requires cleanup actions at these sites. <br /> It therefore is necessary to document all areas proposed for no further action in a primary document. <br /> We are also concerned that historic locations of high VOC soil gas data do not correlate well with the <br /> sample locations performed in the field work and finally, the recommendation for addressing metals in <br /> the South Balloon area. These concerns are expanded in the following sections. <br /> General Comments <br /> 1. Soil gas surveys were conducted in sixteen areas identified as potential sources of VOC <br /> contamination degrading groundwater underlying the Sharpe facility. Based on the OU2 ROD, <br /> seven sites out of the sixteen were identified in the ROD as source areas for groundwater <br /> contamination based on 1987 data. The ROD requires ISV for these sites. These seven sites <br /> were to be further characterized in order to design an in-situ volatilization system. Five of these <br /> sites will proceed to ISV remediation. Two of these sites have been proposed for no further <br /> action based on the Pre-Design data. We question the validity of the field sampling in these two <br /> areas as further described in comment# 3 of this letter. <br />