My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF CALIFORNIA•Environmental Protecti0noency • PETE WILSON,Governor <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road,Suite A -- <br /> Sacramento,CA 95827-3098 <br /> PHONE:(916)2553000 <br /> FAX:(916)2553015 <br /> 19 December 1996 <br /> Mr. Jim Pinasco <br /> Department of Toxic Substances Control <br /> 10151 Croydon Way, Suite 3 <br /> Sacramento, Ca 95827-2106 <br /> OPERABLE UNIT 2 PRE-DESIGN TECHNICAL SUMMARY, DDRW-SHARPE, SAN JOAQUIN <br /> COUNTY <br /> We have reviewed the Operable Unit Pre-Design Technical Summary, dated October 1996, for the <br /> DDRW-Sharpe facility. The purpose of this report was to present the results of additional field work <br /> conducted to verify how these results correlated with previous findings, and develop remedial designs as <br /> required by the Final Basewide Record of Decision for Operable Unit 2 (OU2 ROD) at the DDRW- <br /> Sharpe site. The field work consisted of soil vapor surveys and soil sampling for metals contamination. <br /> We commend Sharpe and its consultants on a good effort to collect useful data in the field. <br /> We have four general concerns with the Pre-Design Technical Summary. The first concerns is we <br /> believe that the OU2 ROD requires that the soil gas data collected as part of this report are to be <br /> evaluated to determine the potential impacts to water quality, not the technical and economic analysis <br /> for volatile organic contaminant(VOC) cleanup as presented. Secondly, the Pre-Design Technical <br /> Summary, which has been considered a secondary document, does not appear to be the appropriate <br /> document for closing sites with no further action when the ROD requires cleanup actions at these sites. <br /> It therefore is necessary to document all areas proposed for no further action in a primary document. <br /> We are also concerned that historic locations of high VOC soil gas data do not correlate well with the <br /> sample locations performed in the field work and finally, the recommendation for addressing metals in <br /> the South Balloon area. These concerns are expanded in the following sections. <br /> General Comments <br /> 1. Soil gas surveys were conducted in sixteen areas identified as potential sources of VOC <br /> contamination degrading groundwater underlying the Sharpe facility. Based on the OU2 ROD, <br /> seven sites out of the sixteen were identified in the ROD as source areas for groundwater <br /> contamination based on 1987 data. The ROD requires ISV for these sites. These seven sites <br /> were to be further characterized in order to design an in-situ volatilization system. Five of these <br /> sites will proceed to ISV remediation. Two of these sites have been proposed for no further <br /> action based on the Pre-Design data. We question the validity of the field sampling in these two <br /> areas as further described in comment# 3 of this letter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.