My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EPA COMMENTS <br /> DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION REGION WEST - TRACY, CALIFORNIA <br /> DRAFT CHEMICAL DATA ACQUISITION PLAN - WELL ABANDONMENT <br /> (MAY 94) <br /> General Comment <br /> 1. The Chemical Data Acquisition Plan (CDAP) is falls short of <br /> describing the actual abandonment procedures for Water <br /> Supply Well #4 . The CDAP does not refer to a well <br /> abandonment work plan. <br /> • The work plan providing abandonment procedures should be <br /> referenced within the introduction of the CDAP. Such a <br /> work plan will typically present well abandonment <br /> procedures, such as geophysical logging, grout placement, <br /> grout composition, and details of other work (similar to <br /> the Draft Final Well Abandonment Work Plan, May 1994) . <br /> Detailed Comments <br /> 2 . Section 3 .2 .2, page 6 <br /> Samples are to be collected using an "AMS liquid sampler. " <br /> • The plan should provide a description of this type of <br /> sampler, perhaps including a diagrammatic sketch, if this <br /> is not a sampler commonly used in the industry. The plan <br /> should clarify whether this sampler and the sampling <br /> method will provide samples with minimal disturbance for <br /> purposes of analyzing concentrations of volatile organic <br /> compounds. <br /> 3 . Sections 3 .4 .3 and 3 .4 .4, page 8, and Section 5 . 1 .1, page 10 <br /> These sections indicate that samples are to be collected at <br /> the midpoint of the second and fourth screened intervals, at <br /> 195 feet and 655 feet on Figure 3, and that one duplicate <br /> sample and one split sample are to be analyzed. However, <br /> EPA believes that samples from the uppermost screened <br /> interval in the Lower Tulare (the third screened interval in <br /> Figure 3) will more likely show the potential presence of <br /> contaminants than samples from the fourth screened interval, <br /> for the purpose of evaluating whether contaminants have <br /> migrated downward through the well. <br /> • The plan should be modified to collect a sample from the <br /> uppermost screened interval in the Lower Tulare (at a <br /> depth between 512 and 523 feet in Figure 3) , either in <br /> addition to the sample at 655 feet or instead of that <br /> deeper sample. Furthermore, the plan should state that <br /> epa/r929jm94 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.