My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Sample shipping should be expedited to meet the holding <br /> time requirement for nitrates and orthophosphate . <br /> S . Table 1 <br /> ea. The analytical methods given in Table 1 are not consistent <br /> with those being used in the Annual Monitoring Report, April <br /> 1994 and in the Draft Final Well Abandonment Work Plan, May <br /> 1994 . <br /> • The analytical methods in Table 1 should be revised to be <br /> consistent with those currently specified in other <br /> DDRW-Tracy monitoring plans and work plans. <br /> 8b. Table 1 indicates a range of reporting limits rather than a <br /> specific value. <br /> • The reporting limit for each analyte or parameter should <br /> be indicated in the work plan. The reporting limits <br /> should be consistent with the annual well monitoring <br /> program. <br /> 9 . Table 2 <br /> Table 2 indicates that the completeness goal is 100$. <br /> Appendix A, Section 5 .4, indicates that the typical <br /> laboratory completeness goal is 90k. <br /> • Completeness criteria should be consistent between <br /> sections . For the constituents of concern, the <br /> completeness goal should be loot since this is a one-time <br /> sampling event . <br /> 10. Figure 3 <br /> Figure 3 shows the Supply Well #4 "Specification. " <br /> • Figure 3 should show additional details of the well <br /> construction, if available, or should clarify if such <br /> details are unknown. The details should include <br /> drilled hole diameter, filter pack description, and <br /> surface seal description. Figure 3 should note the <br /> source of information for the stratigraphy and <br /> as-built well construction. If these details are <br /> provided in a separate well abandonment work plan, <br /> that document should be referenced. <br /> epa/r929J=94 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.