Laserfiche WebLink
13 . Please state the specific ARARs for Section <br /> 9 . 3 . 6s reduction of the cited chemicals. <br /> 14 . Section 9 . 4 . 2 also refers to a T&E analysis that <br /> we have not seen. <br /> 15. Section 9 . 5. 1. 1 should provide the specific <br /> levels for the contaminants of concern and that exceed <br /> water quality criteria, human health criteria, and are <br /> protective of the environment. <br /> 16. Section 9 . 5 . 2 . 2 also refers to a T&E analysis <br /> that we have not seen. <br /> 17 . Section 9 . 5. 3 .2 should primarily refer to the ROD <br /> as the enforcement mechanism. <br /> 18 . Section 9 . 5 . 3 . 4 should be revised to provide a <br /> detailed description for all post ROD monitoring. <br /> 19 . Section 9 . 5. 3 . 6 should provide details of how <br /> ground water monitoring could impact the remedy. <br /> 20. Section 9. 5. 5. 2 also refers to a T&E analysis <br /> that we have not seen. <br /> 21. Section 9 . 5 . 5. 3 , 9 . 5. 6. 4 , and 9 . 5. 7 . 3 should <br /> refer to the specific ARARs for hazardous waste <br /> management and protection of the ground water. <br /> 22 . We have not seen the T&E analysis referred to in <br /> Sections 9 . 6 . 2 . 3 and 9 . 6 . 2 . 7 . <br /> 23 . Explain what is meant by policy review in Section <br /> 9.7 . 1 and how it ties into the five year review. <br /> 24 . Section 10. 1 recommends two sites for NFA due to <br /> high cost and the lack of unacceptable risk. This <br /> recommendation must be supported with data. The Draft <br /> ROD should present this data or recommend a different <br /> alternative. <br /> 25. Section 10. 5. 4 . 1 should provide details on how <br /> environmental receptors will be protected. <br /> 26. Section 10.7 should detail what will be entailed <br /> in the institutional controls. <br /> 27 . Section 10.7 . 2 should specify the ARARs <br /> necessary. <br /> 28 . Section 10. 9 . 2 should specify the ARARs <br /> necessary. <br /> JP.bdi <br /> m:\smp-omf\hong\pinasco\JP33W.077 <br />