My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:33:59 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:23:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INITIAL RELEASE DDJC Tracy <br /> No chronic MRI. or RfD exists for TCE. Inadequate data exist for evaluating noncancer effects <br /> associated with chronic exposures to TCE. Chronic oral exposure studies (e.g., drinking water <br /> studies) in animals have focused on cancer endpoints, not noncancer effects. Furthermore, EPA <br /> recently withdrew the intermediate MRL TCE. The study on which the intermediate MRL for <br /> TCE was based has been questioned because it contains certain flaws and limitations (e.g., the <br /> exact amount of TCE-contaminated water consumed by rats in the study is uncertain) (ATSDR, <br /> 1997). Therefore, when evaluating possible exposures to TCE, ATSDR considered only cancer. <br /> To evaluate cancer effects, ATSDR uses Cancer Potency Factors (CPFs) that define the <br /> relationship between oral exposure doses and the increased likelihood of developing cancer over a <br /> lifetime. The CPFs are developed using data from animal or human studies and often require <br /> extrapolation from high exposure doses administered in animal studies to the lower exposure <br /> levels typical of human exposure to environmental contaminants. CPFs represent the upper-bound <br /> estimate of the probability of developing cancer at a defined level of exposure; therefore, they <br /> tend to be very conservative (i.e., overestimate the actual risk) in order to account for a number <br /> of uncertainties in the data used in the extrapolation. <br /> ATSDR estimated the potential for cancer to occur using the following equation. (The estimated <br /> exposure doses and CPF values for the contaminants of concern are incorporated into the <br /> equation): <br /> Lifetime Cancer Risk=Estimated exposure dose (mg/kg/day) x CPF(mg/kg/day)-` <br /> Although no risk of cancer is considered acceptable, it is impossible to achieve a zero cancer risk. <br /> Consequently, ATSDR often uses a range of 104 to 10-6 estimated lifetime cancer risk (or 1 new <br /> case in 10,000 to 1,000,000 exposed persons), based on conservative assumptions about <br /> exposure, to determine whether a concern regarding cancer effects is valid. <br /> In addition to estimating the likelihood of noncancer and cancer effects, ATSDR reviewed the <br /> literature to evaluate possible health effects associated with exposure at the doses/concentrations <br /> estimated for the pathways described above. <br /> Estimated Exposure Dose for Consumption of Contaminants in Private Well Water <br /> ATSDR used the following equation to estimate an exposure dose for ingestion of water: <br /> Estimated exposure dose=Conc. x CF x IR x EF x ED <br /> BW x AT <br /> where: <br /> C-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.