Laserfiche WebLink
=AL RELEASE DDJC Tracy <br /> been exposed, ATSDR made assumptions about exposure duration and concentrations. ATSDR <br /> assumed EPA's national upper-bound limit at one residence of 30 years for an exposure duration <br /> for an adult and 6 years exposure for a child and that individuals drank the maximum <br /> concentration of carbon tetrachloride detected over the entire 30-year exposure duration for <br /> adults. Actual exposures were probably much less because the residents have been supplied with <br /> bottled water and/or a carbon filtration system and no one is thought to have been consistently <br /> using water containing the highest levels of contaminants for this extended period of time. <br /> ATSDR estimated a daily exposure dose of carbon tetrachloride (adult: 0.00005 mg/kg/day; child: <br /> 0.0001 mg/kg/day) from drinking private well water are approximately 7 to 14 times less than <br /> EPA's chronic RM of 0.0007 mg/kg/day. Because the estimated exposure doses for both the <br /> adult and child are less than the RfD for carbon tetrachloride, ATSDR does not expect that <br /> drinking water form private wells, even over a 30-year period, would lead to an increased <br /> likelihood of developing noncancer health effects. <br /> To account for dermal (skin contact) and inhalation(breathing vapors) exposures that might <br /> occur during domestic use of the water, ATSDR assumed that these exposures each equal the <br /> exposure from drinking the water. In applying this assumption, ATSDR multiplied the estimated <br /> oral dose by three (to consider all three routes: ingestion, inhalation of vapors, dermal contact). <br /> The resulting overall estimated doses are still less than the RID for carbon tetrachloride, <br /> respectively. <br /> Cancer <br /> EPA has classified carbon tetrachloride as a probable human carcinogen. The link between TCE <br /> and cancer at relatively low levels is controversial, however. Although TCE has been shown to <br /> cause cancer in laboratory animals given large doses, available human studies for WE are <br /> inconclusive and the data are inadequate to establish a causal fink. Because of these uncertainties, <br /> EPA is currently reviewing the scientific literature pertaining the carcinogenicity of TCE. As a <br /> conservative screening measure, ATSDR used a previously derived CPF for TCE of 0.11 <br /> mg/kg/day''. This approach provides a conservative evaluation of the likelihood of past exposure <br /> to TCE. Using the CPFs for carbon tetrachloride and for TCE, ATSDR derived excess cancer risk <br /> TCE from drinking the private well water. <br /> The resulting cancer estimates are 9 x 10' for TCE and carbon 3 x 10-6for carbon tetrachloride, <br /> or roughly three new cancer cases over a lifetime in 1,000,000 exposed persons. ATSDR believes <br /> that even if people drank water containing the highest detected levels of WE or carbon <br /> tetrachloride for a very long time, it is unlikely that the level of exposure would lead to cancer. <br /> C-4 <br />