Laserfiche WebLink
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY <br /> A v Region 9 <br /> 75 Hawthorne Street <br /> � P San Francisco CA 94105-3901 <br /> November 18, 1998 <br /> Marshall Cloud <br /> Environmental Protection Office <br /> DD-Tracy <br /> P.O. Box 960001 <br /> Stockton, CA 95296-0250 <br /> RE: Draft Final Remedial Design Work Plan, DDJC-Tracy, October 1998 <br /> Dear Marshall, <br /> Thank you for the Draft Final Remedial Design Work Plan, DD-Tracy, <br /> October 1998. The following address DDJC-Tracy's responses to EPA comments <br /> presented in Appendix G of the Draft Final Remedial Design Work Plan. <br /> We believe that these non-controversial changes can be made most , <br /> efficiently by providing slip pages prior to finalization of the document. <br /> Please let me know if you have an alternative suggestion. <br /> 1. Response to EPA Comment 8 (Surface and Near-Surface Soils, page 7-2, <br /> Section 7.2.5) Reference: EPA August 11, 1998 Letter to Marshall <br /> Cloud, EPA Preliminary Comments on the Draft RD Work Plan, July 98 <br /> (Sections 4.3 and 7) <br /> This comment was only partially addressed. Neither the text in <br /> Paragraph 7.2.3 .2 nor Figure 7-1 were apparently modified to include the <br /> rationale for the approximate outline of the contaminated soil area <br /> (approximated by existing topography and the former stockpile <br /> locations) . Please modify the text or figure to include this rationale. <br /> 2. Response to EPA General Comment 5 (Sample Location Flowcharts, Figures <br /> 5-1 through 5-3) Reference: EPA September 22, 1998 Letter to Marshall <br /> Cloud, DD-Tracy Comprehensive Draft Remedial Design Work Plan, July 98 <br /> (remaining sections) <br /> This comment was only partially addressed. The fact that the Project <br /> Team consisted of only two Radian field members was not clarified in the <br /> figures or the accompanying text. Please modify the figures or text to <br /> include this clarification. <br /> 3 . Response to EPA Detailed Comment 6 (Section 1.1.1.2, SWMU 33 remedial <br /> action, page 3-1) <br /> This comment was only partially addressed. The text in Section 1.1.1 .2 <br /> was apparently not modified to include a statement that the limited <br />