Laserfiche WebLink
• Data obtained from an area known or thought to be contaminated with metals <br /> cannot be used to determine background for metals (i.e., the IWPs, the IWPL, <br /> the old IWP, the burn pits, possibly underground storage tanks); <br /> • Data obtained from an area known or thought to be contaminated with acids, <br /> which are likely to mobilize metal constituents, should not be used to <br /> determine background for metals (i.e., sumps in the IWPL, the old and present <br /> IWPs); likewise, an area contaminated with chlorinated solvents which could <br /> mobilize metals might not constitute a suitable background location for <br /> metals (i.e., the IWPs, the IWPL, and various other locations); <br /> 8. Page 3-9, Sections 3.9.2.1 and 3.9.2.2 <br /> The criteria discussed above (Section 3.9.1.3) should be considered when determining <br /> background locations for metals and for pesticides. (Background values for VOCs <br /> are, presumably, zero concentrations.) <br /> 9. Pages 3-9 and 3-10, Section 3.9.2.3 <br /> The text states "Much of the existing groundwater data for DDRB'-Tracy is not <br /> considered representative of dissolved metals and pesticides concentrations because of <br /> sample turbidity." However, EPA does not understand the cause/effect relationship <br /> which is asserted in this sentence. <br /> • Please explain in the text of the document how sample turbidity would <br /> impact the representativeness of dissolved metals and pesticides or delete this <br /> sentence. <br /> Further, it is unclear if the intent of this paragraph is to invalidate all WCC's <br /> groundwater data taken from monitoring wells LM] through LM43 and analyzed for <br /> filtered (dissolved) metals as a part of the well monitoring program at DDRW-Tracy. <br /> • Please explain in the text whether DDRW-Tracy intends to invalidate some <br /> portion of the existing database. [Note that total metals data from more than <br /> one quarterly sampling round may be necessary in order to develop the <br /> baseline risk assessment (BRA).] <br /> Note also that the range of organic carbon partitioning coefficient (Koc) varies <br /> greatly depending upon the chemical structure of the pesticide. Jury and Ghodrati <br /> (1) demonstrate experimental Koc values ranging from 20 ml/g (or m$/kg) for 2,4- <br /> dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) to 240,000 ms/kg for DDT; the Koc value for <br /> dieldrin falls between these extremes at 12,000 ms/kg. DDRW-Tracy should treat <br /> each of these pesticides in the RI/FS according to its relative mobility. ' <br /> Referring to the last sentence on page 3-10, the quarterly groundwater monitoring by j <br /> both WCC and JMM, do not suggest the presence of any pesticides that are ubiquitous <br /> throughrut the region of DDRW-Tracy. <br /> USEPA/R9 12 Apr 93 4119 <br />