Laserfiche WebLink
• • Page 3 of 8 <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: tarantino, Steve; ggibson@ci.lathrop.ca.us; jlfio@hydrofocus.com; <br /> Ckeaten@ci.lathrop.ca.us; jzilles@kleinfelder.com <br /> Subject: RE: Well Maps [Item 3 of 3] <br /> Mike, <br /> I'll look into that last question and get back to you. <br /> --Dave <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 2:01 PM <br /> To: umezaki, dave <br /> Subject: RE: Well Maps [Item 3 of 3] <br /> thanks again. <br /> One of the points I was hoping to make was that I was reluctant to'step in'with CNP (as a <br /> private well owner) at this time. Once I'm satisfied which wells are who's, I will step in and let <br /> these private well owners know what EHD is expecting of them. They will have options to <br /> enter into a Monitoring program with us or remove the wells under an EHD permit I could <br /> issue. <br /> Another point I was going for was that before I issue any more permits for COLJWRP, I must <br /> know ALL about the existing wells/permits. I don't really want to slow up your progress, but I <br /> find I get results like your help much quicker when you know that future work depends on <br /> past work being adequately handled. <br /> you've done a great job with researching all of these permits and wells. I have confidence that <br /> you will supply me with all I need to be able to generate a list of monitoring wells that will be <br /> on the CoL list of responsibility and which ones won't. <br /> I haven't formulated a conclusion yet, but have you determined which wells are definately <br /> NOT going to be on the CoL list yet? <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: umezaki, dave [mailto:dumezaki@EIQCONSULT.COM] <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 1:46 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: tarantino, Steve; ggibson@ci.lathrop.ca.us;jlfio@hydrofocus.com; <br /> Ckeaten@ci.lath rop.ca.us; jzilles@kleinfelder.com <br /> Subject: RE: Well Maps [Item 3 of 3] <br /> Mike, <br /> One clarification --the California Natural Products wells really are under the <br /> responsibility of California Natural Products, not the City. I was able to track down <br /> copies of the boring logs and the permits for those wells because we happen to have <br /> the same consultants as the ones working on those properties, but these wells are not <br /> the City's to"use or lose". I don't have a contact with California Natural Products, so I <br /> don't know whether the wells are needed or whether they're being used. You'd have <br /> to contact California Natural Products for that information. <br /> Your general point, though, is well taken. Some of the wells (the RMW wells being a <br /> 9/21/2005 <br />