My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISTOPHER
>
18800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523929
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2019 10:47:55 AM
Creation date
5/30/2019 10:22:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0523929
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016100
FACILITY_NAME
WRP #1/ CITY OF LATHROP
STREET_NUMBER
18800
STREET_NAME
CHRISTOPHER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19813035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
18800 CHRISTOPHER WAY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
447
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 6 of 14 <br /> Subject: RE: Well Maps [Item 3 of 31 <br /> thanks again. <br /> One of the points I was hoping to make was that I was <br /> reluctant to'step in'with CNP (as a private well owner)at <br /> this time. Once I'm satisfied which wells are who's, I will <br /> step in and let these private well owners know what EHD is <br /> expecting of them. They will have options to enter into a <br /> Monitoring program with us or remove the wells under an <br /> EHD permit I could issue. <br /> Another point I was going for was that before I issue any <br /> more permits for COL/WRP, 1 must know ALL about the <br /> existing wells/permits. I don't really want to slow up your <br /> progress, but I find I get results like your help much quicker <br /> when you know that future work depends on past work <br /> being adequately handled. <br /> you've done a great job with researching all of these <br /> permits and wells. I have confidence that you will supply <br /> me with all I need to be able to generate a list of monitoring <br /> wells that will be on the CoL list of responsibility and which <br /> ones won't. <br /> I haven't formulated a conclusion yet, but have you <br /> determined which wells are definately NOT going to be on <br /> the CoL list yet? <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: umezaki, dave <br /> [mailto:dumezaki@EKICONSU LT.COM] <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 1:46 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: tarantino, steve; ggibson@ci.lathrop.ca.us; <br /> jlfio@hydrofocus.com; Ckeaten@ci.lathrop.ca.us; <br /> jzilles@kleinfelder.com <br /> Subject: RE: Well Maps [Item 3 of 3] <br /> Mike, <br /> One clarification --the California Natural Products <br /> wells really are under the responsibility of California <br /> Natural Products, not the City. I was able to track <br /> down copies of the boring logs and the permits for <br /> those wells because we happen to have the same <br /> consultants as the ones working on those properties, <br /> but these wells are not the City's to"use or lose". <br /> I don't have a contact with California Natural <br /> Products, so I don't know whether the wells are <br /> needed or whether they're being used. You'd have <br /> to contact California Natural Products for that <br /> information. <br /> Your general point, though, is well taken. Some of <br /> the wells (the RMW wells being a likely example)are <br /> the City's responsibility or will become the City's <br /> 9/26/2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.