My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS 3RD QUARTER 2009 (1)
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISTOPHER
>
18800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523929
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS 3RD QUARTER 2009 (1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2019 10:49:23 AM
Creation date
5/30/2019 10:30:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
3RD QUARTER 2009 (1)
RECORD_ID
PR0523929
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016100
FACILITY_NAME
WRP #1/ CITY OF LATHROP
STREET_NUMBER
18800
STREET_NAME
CHRISTOPHER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19813035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
18800 CHRISTOPHER WAY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
analysis procedures and to evaluate potential matrix interference. Matrix <br /> interference is defined as the effect of the sample matrix on the precision of the <br /> extraction and/or analysis procedure. These effects may bias the sample results <br /> either high or low. <br /> MS or MSD samples are prepared by adding a known quantity of the target <br /> analyte(s) to a sample. The samples are then extracted and analyzed as a typical <br /> environmental sample and the results are reported as a percent recovery. <br /> Spike analysis result-original sample concentration <br /> �/oRecovery= }{ 100°/0 <br /> Concentration of spike addition <br /> Duplicate analyses are performed by the laboratory to evaluate the precision of <br /> analytical procedures. The laboratory performed LCSD analyses. Precision is <br /> evaluated by calculating a relative percent difference (RPD) using the following <br /> equation: <br /> Spike Concentration— Spike Duplicate Concentration <br /> RPD%= l p p px 100% <br /> 2(Spike Concentration+ Spike Duplicate Concentration) <br /> The RPD results for all analytes were within the QC control limits. Sample results <br /> for the QC batch were accepted by the lab based on the percent recoveries <br /> and/or other acceptable QC data. The RPD and/or percent recovery for all quality <br /> control samples were within acceptable limits. <br /> - E-2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.