Laserfiche WebLink
„ , <br /> 0 A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> The groundwater analytical results measured at monitoring well MW2 showed detectable <br /> concentrations of TPHg and BTEX TPHg was detected at a concentration of 540 llg/L, toluene <br /> was detected at 14 µg/L, and xylenes were detected at 10 Pg/L <br /> The groundwater analytical results measured at monitoring well MW3 showed detectable <br /> concentrations of TPHg and BTEX TPHg was detected at a concentration of 820 µg/L, toluene <br /> was detected at 1 4 pg/L, ethylbenzene at 5 2 pg/L, and xylenes at 4 R pg/L <br /> The Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for benzene, 1 pg/L, was exceeded In a groundwater <br /> sample collected from monitoring well MW I which had a detected concentration of 15 Pg/L <br /> GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Water level measurements were collected from monitoring wells MW 1, MW2, and MW3 on <br /> December 2, 2002 Water level elevations ranged from 37 47 to 37 51, representing an average <br /> Increase in water table elevation of approximately 1 31 feet since September 2002 The water <br /> level data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3) Assuming <br /> that horizontal Isotropic conditions prevail, groundwater In the uppermost aquifer beneath the <br /> site flowed towards the northwest The average hydraulic gradient on December 2, 2002 was <br /> calculated to be 0 0005 or approximately 2 7 ft/mile A summary of groundwater monitoring <br /> data Is presented In Table 1 <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> Groundwater flow direction and gradient Is consistent with previous sampling events Water <br /> table elevations have Increased slightly since the September 2002 monitoring event <br /> Groundwater analytical results remained within historical parameters as set by previous <br /> groundwater analytical results <br /> • <br /> W lwordpro1149811Repor1sl4QR-02 doc 3 <br />