Laserfiche WebLink
v <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C . <br /> i- petroleum hydrocarbons. One groundwater sample was collected from each boring at the depth <br /> groundwater was first encountered. Groundwater samples indicated the presence of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons. Results are summarized in ATC's Summary Report of Additional Subsurface <br /> �- Investigation, dated September 9, 1998. <br /> On February 18, 1999, a geologist from ATC Associates supervised the installation of three <br /> L' groundwater monitoring wells from 39 to 41 feet bgs. Soil borings MW1, MW2, and MW3 were <br /> completed as two-inch monitoring wells. One soil sample from each boring was collected and <br /> after the groundwater monitoring wells were developed on groundwater sample was collected <br /> ` from each well. Soil and groundwater samples contained detectable concentrations of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons. Results are summarized in ATC's Summary Report of Additional Subsurface <br /> LO Investigation, dated June 1, 1999. <br /> In September and October 2001, a geologist from ATC Associates supervised the advancement of <br /> six off-site soil borings to approximately 25 feet bgs. Analytical results of soil and groundwater <br /> samples indicated that no petroleum hydrocarbons were present off site. One soil boring was <br /> advanced on site in the vicinity of the former USTs to evaluate the vertical extent of impacted <br /> L groundwater. A groundwater sample collected from the second water-bearing zone indicated that <br /> no petroleum hydrocarbons were present. Results are summarized in ATC's Summary Report of <br /> " Supplemental Subsurface Investigation, dated January 4, 2002. <br /> 2.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS <br /> r— 22.1 Hydrogeology <br /> Water level measurements were collected from wells MW1 through MW3 on July 16, 2002. <br /> `r Water levels ranged from 27.37 to 28.01 feet below the tops of the well casing elevations_ <br /> Assuming that horizontal isotropic conditions prevail, groundwater in the uppermost aquifer <br /> beneath the site flowed towards the northeast. The average hydraulic gradient on July 16, 2002 <br /> ` was calculated to be 0.001 ft/ft or approximately 5.3 ft/mile. A summary of groundwater <br /> monitoring data is presented in Table 1. <br /> 3.0 GROUNDWATER PUMPING PILOT TEST <br /> L The objective of this pump test was to determine whether groundwater extraction will lower <br /> the concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents to acceptable levels over a reasonable <br /> period. The following information was collected and evaluated: <br /> • Radius of influence of groundwater extraction; <br /> • Groundwater drawdown; <br /> ' • Hydrogeologic properties of the aquifer; <br /> • Mass extraction rate of groundwater. <br /> w:\wordpro1149811repoMTump_test.doe 2 <br /> L <br />