My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001630
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CLAY
>
639
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544513
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001630
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2019 12:17:38 PM
Creation date
6/14/2019 10:48:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001630
RECORD_ID
PR0544513
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0024115
FACILITY_NAME
WEST CLAY PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
639
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CLAY
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
14707110
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
639 W CLAY ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> • 14 May 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 01-0865 <br /> Page 4of5 <br /> I2 2 5 Extracted Ground Water Disposal <br /> On 06 August 2001, the ground water extracted during the pumping test was pumped from the { <br /> aboveground storage poly tank into a vacuum truck (supplied by American Valley Waste Oil), <br /> approximately 2,650 gallons ofpurged water was transported off-site under a non-,hazardous waste <br /> manifest to Seaport Petroleum, a waste treatment facility located in Redwood City, California <br /> Documentation and uniform hazardous waste manifests for disposal of the pump test extracted water <br /> is contained in Appendix F <br /> ' r <br /> 3.4. ' SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS < <br /> The implications from the aquifer ground water pumping tests are <br /> • During the aquifer pumping rate test, maximum ground water draw-down of 7 98 feet was <br /> observed in extraction well EW-2 following approximately 465 minutes of pumping <br /> operation, ground water draw-down was observed m each of the observation wells ranging <br /> from 1 96 feet(MW-2 located approximately 15 feet west-southwest of EW-2)to 0 05 feet <br /> (MW-5 located approximately 84 feet south of EW-2) Draw-down results are presented on <br /> Table 2 and in Appendix A, Figure 2 illustrates well locations <br /> • Utilizing a semi-logarithmic plot of ground water draw-down vs observation well distance <br /> to pumping well(Jacob straight-line method),a best-fit line can be utilized to project a radius <br /> of influence of approximately 82 feet at 6 gpm (Appendx B) <br /> • Utilizing the Distance-Drawdown Method(Jacob straight-line method),a transmissivitywas <br /> calculated at 230 fl/day (equivalent to 1,740 gallons per day/ft) and a storativity value <br /> calculated at 0 026 (Appendix D) t <br /> • Based Ion a transmissivity value of 230 ft/day and an,aquifer thickness equal to 20 ft(screen <br /> interval at EW-2), a hydraulic conductivity value was calculated at 87 ft/day, or 0 031 cm/s <br /> (Appendix D), a hydraulic conductivity of 0 031 cm/s is consistent with a screened interval <br /> --located within silty sand or clean sand-(Appendix G)- �- <br /> • Laboratory analysis of extracted water collected during the pumping test detected elevated <br /> concentrations of TPH-g,TPH-d and BTEX(Table 3,Appendix E) Detected concentrations <br /> of target analytes were higher in the sample collected at 4 GPM than in the sainple collected <br /> at 5 GPM The higher pumping rate may be diluting contarninant concentrations by drawing <br /> more clean water'into the extraction well <br /> 1 <br /> o- <br /> - Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.