Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> C Project No. E6576.001 itional Groundwater Sampling/W. Clover flw� 22 March 1995 � <br /> f <br /> backfill sands were removed, and these were found to locally extend to a maximum depth of <br /> 10.0 feet. Contaminated areas of the native soils in the original tank pit walls and bottom were <br /> also removed. These could be discerned on the basis of odor and/or stain, the native tan to <br /> Clight red-brown color being locally discolored to various shades of grey. The water level in <br /> the excavation was measured at a depth of 6.5 feet. Although there was some difficulty in <br /> r removing contaminated soil below the water table, much of the original excavation work was <br /> L done with a minimum of groundwater; and most of the loose muck was clean cave-in from the <br /> sidewalls of the pit. <br /> C <br /> Approximately 300 cubic yards of material was removed, of which about 100 cub <br /> yards were clean overburden. The clean soils were segregated from the soils observed to be <br /> contaminated. On Monday, November 7, after the bulk of the excavation had been completed, <br /> a grab sample was taken from the water that was standing in the pit. No contamination was ll <br /> found (see Table 2, below). During the excavation, it was observed that the only 11 '1 <br /> contamination odor was that of diesel; and, since the records indicated that the tanks held diesel <br /> L fuel, it was agreed that subsequent testing would be for diesel and BTEX rather than motor oil <br /> and BTEX. The locations of the confirmatory soil samples in the excavation pit and <br /> ..J overburden stockpile are given in Figures 2 and 3, Appendix A. Samples were taken from <br /> eight locations in the contaminated soils stockpile, at depths of 1.5 to 2.0 feet. These locations <br /> are given in Figure 4, Appendix A. <br /> EXCAVATION SAMPLING RESULTS <br /> The results of the confirmatory samples test results are given in Table 3 below. The <br /> results of the "contaminated" stockpile sampling are given in Table 4. It is seen that, even in <br /> the "contaminated" stockpile, contamination is very low. The eight samples were composited <br /> into two 4 to 1 samples, one of which was found uncontaminated and, in the other, the only <br /> Ccontamination was 22 ppm of diesel. <br /> C <br /> TERRASEA RCH, INC. Page 7 <br />