Laserfiche WebLink
� ` <br /> ~ ^�°� <br /> ~ <br /> ^ <br /> The ground water flow direction on 12/02/87 was directly <br /> towards the domestic well located about 140 feet northwest of the <br /> excavation. This probably resulted from pumpage from this well ; � <br /> the well is probably hydraulically connected to the water table <br /> aquifer ( a well log is not available ) . <br /> The 147. 5 degree swing in the direction of ground water flow <br /> between 12/03 and 12/21 is most likely attributable to either a <br /> cessation of pumpage in the domestic well , or the onset of heavy ` <br /> pumpage from a nearby well to the east of the site. Since the � <br /> magnitude of the gradient on 12/21 is twice that on 12/03, the , <br /> writer feels that most likely, the flow direction swing results � <br /> from heavy pumpage to the east of the site. <br /> This change in the ground water flow direction has <br /> apparently caused a regulatory problem at this site. The problem <br /> stems from the requirement that a monitoring well must be <br /> installed and sampled down gradient from the source of <br /> contamination. Since the gradient has swung around, it is hard <br /> to tell just where down gradient is. Thus, planning for a well <br /> location is complicated. <br /> Recently, W. H. Fox II of WIN Environmental Consultants, <br /> remeasured the ground water level in these wells. The wells were <br /> measured on 9/ 16 , 9/30 and 10/07/88. The writer constructed a <br /> three point problem to determine direction and magnitude of the <br /> ground water gradient. This time, there was even yet another <br /> solution to the problem which follows: <br /> 9/16 - 9/30 - 10/07 --- N 25 E @ . 256 ft / 100 ft <br /> This represents an average of the three readings, the maximum <br /> variation of which was 0. 07 ft. The readings for each of the <br /> three wells for each of the three days are shown in the appendix , <br /> along with well readings for toe measurements in December of <br /> 1987. <br /> ' ) <br /> The possible contamination at this site results from a <br /> rupture of a 1500 gallon tank as it was being removed from the <br /> site. The writer understands that approximately 20 to 50 gallons <br /> of motor oil escaped from the ruptured tank, into the bottom of a <br /> 7 foot deep excavation. The spill was cleaned up by excavation <br /> of the soil in the bottom of the hole. This took about 15 <br /> minutes; the hole was deepened from 7 to 12 feet. During the <br /> deepening of the excavation, ground water was encountered. <br /> Approximately 4 cubic yards of material was excavated from the <br /> hole. Water from the bottom of the excavation was sampled . The <br /> lab results disclosed 39 ppm motor oil , 20 ppb benzene and 50 ppb <br /> xylene. The above was told to the writer by W. H. Fox II , who was ^ <br /> . present at the time of the incident. <br /> 3 <br />