Laserfiche WebLink
APPENDIX A:RESULTS OF YEAR 3 TREE MONITORING <br /> APPENDIX A <br /> Results of Year 3 2009 Tree Monitoring-Holt Ph toremediation Site <br /> Average Number Percent <br /> Species Vigor Number of Dead Dead Percent <br /> Area Acronym Common Name Scientific Name Score' of Trees Trees Trees' Survivorship <br /> Area B ACNE box elder Acer negundo var.califomicum 1.7 3 <br /> POFR Fremont Populus fremontii ssp. fremontii 2.1 28 1 <br /> cottonwood <br /> SAGO black willow Salix gooddingfi 2.7 18 1 <br /> Total 2.3 49 2 4% 96% <br /> Area C POFR Fremont Populus fremonfif ssp. fremontfi 1.6 8 1 <br /> cottonwood <br /> SAGO black willow Salix gooddingii 2.3 7 <br /> Total 1.9 15 1 7% 93% <br /> Area D ACNE box elder Acer negundo var.califomicum 1.9 10 2 <br /> POFR Fremont Populus fremontii ssp. fremonfii 2.1 14 <br /> cottonwood <br /> QULO valley oak Quercus lobata 2.0 12 1 <br /> SAGO black willow Salix gooddingii 0.9 14 7 <br /> Total 1.7 50 10 20% 80% <br /> TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES (ALL SITES) 239 22 <br /> AVERAGE PERCENT TREE SURVIVORSHIP (ALL SITES) 91"x° <br /> AVERAGE VIGOR SCORE (ALL SITES) 2.2 <br /> eSlight numerical discrepancies in averaged scores are due to rounding. <br /> °Not visible.Assumed dead due to surrounding tree fall <br /> `Vigor Ranks: High(3)tree has 67 to 100 percent healthy foliage;Medium(2)tree has 34 to 66 percent healthy foliage; Low(1)tree has 0 to 33 percent healthy <br /> foliage <br /> SAC/166749IPANAGON(YEAR3_2009_HOLTTREE_MONITORING REPORT.DOC) <br /> A-2 <br /> M <br />