My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS 2011 YEAR 5 PHYTOREMEDIATION TREE MONITORING REPORT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COOK
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505378
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS 2011 YEAR 5 PHYTOREMEDIATION TREE MONITORING REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 11:18:28 AM
Creation date
6/18/2019 10:57:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2011 YEAR 5 PHYTOREMEDIATION TREE MONITORING REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0505378
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0006743
FACILITY_NAME
HOLT LEAK SITE
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
COOK
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
HOLT
Zip
95234
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
COOK RD
P_LOCATION
99
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTION 4:YEAR 5 TREE MONITORING RESULTS <br /> ' texture and fertility are very poor. Fifteen Fremont cottonwood and black willow trees were <br /> ' planted in this area. <br /> Year 1 (2007) <br /> ' Three Fremont cottonwood trees (or 20 percent) died in this planting area during Year 1 <br /> (2007). The average health and vigor score in 2007 was 1.6,which fell in between the"low' <br /> and "medium' ranks. This was the second lowest health and vigor score of all the planting <br /> ' areas during Year 1 (2007) monitoring. <br /> Year 2 (2008) <br /> Survivorship in Year 2 (2008) (80 percent)was the same as Year 1 (2007).This planting area <br /> contained the same three Fremont cottonwoods that died during 2007.These trees were <br /> replanted in late November,2008,subsequent to the Year 2 (2008) annual tree monitoring. <br /> Survivorship of these replanted trees will be assessed in Year 3 (2009). <br /> The average health and vigor score for 2008 was 1.3,slightly lower than the average <br /> calculated for 2007 (1.6). Health and vigor scores of both species contributed to the decline. <br /> This health and vigor score was the lowest of all six sub areas. <br /> Year 3 (2009) <br /> ' The rate of survivorship in Planting Area C in Year 3 (2009) increased to 93 percent from <br /> 80 percent as recorded in both monitoring Years 1 and 2 (Table 4-1). One Fremont <br /> cottonwood died in Year 3 (2009) (Appendix A) compared to three trees in Years 1 and 2 <br /> (2007 and 2008). <br /> ' The heath and vigor scores for trees within this planting area in Years 1, 2,and 3 are below a <br /> rank of 2(or in between"low" and"medium' health and vigor ranks) (Table 4-2). The <br /> health and vigor scores calculated in Year 3 (2009) increased slightly compared to the scores <br /> in Year 1 (1.6) and Year 2 (1.3). The Year 3 (2009) score of 1.9 is only slightly between a <br /> medium' rank(Table 4-2).The trees within this planting area are short for their age and it <br /> is likely that the roots are still confined to the engineered fill zone. Tree growth and health <br /> ' and vigor scores are expected to increase once tree roots extend beyond this compacted <br /> layer. <br /> Year 4(2010) <br /> ' The rate of survivorship in Planting Area C in Year 4 (2010) is 93 percent (Table 4-1), the <br /> same value as reported in Year 3 (2009).The Fremont cottonwood that was recorded as dead <br /> in Year 3 (2009) did not resprout,as some cottonwoods did onsite,but no additional trees <br /> died in Year 4 (2010). Lower survivorship rates (80 percent) were recorded for both Years 1 <br /> and 2(2007 and 2008) (Table 4-1). <br /> ' In Year 4 (2010), the health and vigor score for this planting area (2.2) increased above a rank <br /> of 2 or"medium' for the first time (Appendix A). Previously, the heath and vigor scores for <br /> trees within this planting area in Years 1, 2, and 3 were below a rank of 2 (or in between <br /> "low" and"medium' health and vigor ranks) (Table 4-2).The health and vigor scores <br /> calculated in Year 3 (2009) increased slightly compared to the scores in Year 1 (1.6) and <br /> Year 2 (1.3).The Year 3 (2009) score of 1.9 is slightly below a "medium' rank (Table 4-2). <br /> SAD4203071113570001(YEAR5-2011 HOLTTREE MONITORING_REPORT-FINAL.DOCX) 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.