My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COPPEROPOLIS
>
10848
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536777
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 11:38:10 AM
Creation date
6/18/2019 11:11:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0536777
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0021126
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER COUNTRYSIDE MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
10848
STREET_NAME
COPPEROPOLIS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
10311006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
10848 COPPEROPOLIS RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br /> Former Countryside Market,Stockton, California <br /> Feasibility Study and Interim Remedial Action Plan May 20,2013 <br /> groundwater, and the groundwater gradient carrying those aqueous phase COPCs outside of this <br /> zone and subsequently into smear zone area/capillary fringe soils as groundwater levels rise and fall). <br /> According to California Environmental Protection Agency guidance (Cal/ PA 2005), humans may be <br /> exposed to the upper 10 feet of soil, although direct contact is most likely to occur in surface soils <br /> (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2002). Thus, since the former UST area was covered with <br /> clean soil and pea gravel following excavation activities to a depth great ir than 10 feet bgs, surface <br /> and near surface soil related exposure via dermal contact, ingestion and/or inhalation is not <br /> considered a complete pathway. <br /> 3.1.2 Ambient Air <br /> COPCs in soil can become airborne through the disturbance of soil by wird or mechanical means and <br /> the subsequent entrainment of soil particles in the air. Airborne particulates (i.e., dust) are available <br /> for exposure through inhalation when a receptor is outdoors. Chemicals could also potentially be <br /> released to outdoor air via vapor migration from COPCs in the subsurface <br /> Based on previous environmental investigation results at the Site (Sectio 2.0) that indicate maximum <br /> soil concentrations being present at a depth of 50 feet bgs back in 2001 c oupled with the fact that the <br /> former UST area is not covered (i.e., open grass covered lot with n asphalt and/or concrete), <br /> infiltration from rainfall and irrigation has continued unobstructed for approximately two decades since <br /> the tanks were removed in 1993. Additionally, the top 10 feet of soil in the former UST area was <br /> removed and replaced with clean fill in 1995. <br /> The above factors have effectively served to both limit the presence of COPCs in the shallow <br /> subsurface and drive them to greater depths. Thus, the vast majority of OPCs at the Site are either <br /> located in the deeper soil horizon beneath the former UST area (i.e., grDater than approximately 50 <br /> feet bgs) or within residually impacted soil at or near the groundwater table. Given this present <br /> condition and the fact that the depth to groundwater at the Site is located at over 80 feet bgs, diffusion <br /> from the subsurface to ambient air is deemed to be an insignificant expos ire pathway. <br /> 3.1.3 Indoor Air <br /> Volatile chemicals can enter indoor air via subsurface vapor migrations (surface and/or subsurface <br /> soils) and/or from impacted groundwater that is pumped to the surface. ' This pathway is relevant to <br /> only volatile COPCs and to receptors spending time indoors. For the reasons described above such <br /> as the depth to groundwater and given that no overlying structures are p esent over or in proximity to <br /> the former UST area (anticipated future use of the property is for it to re nain residential/agricultural), <br /> diffusion from the subsurface to indoor air is only considered to be an insignificant exposure pathway. <br /> Similarly, due to the extremely low concentrations of CPOCs that have been detected in groundwater <br /> (predominantly below groundwater screening levels for evaluation of potential vapor intrusion <br /> concerns per Table E-1 of the February 2013 Environmental Screeni g Levels, CRWQCB - San <br /> FewbilM Study and lFeasibity Study&[W TeM FinaLCoc 3-2 The Source Group,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.