Laserfiche WebLink
Evaluation Work Plan for 3 1 October 2009 <br /> Septic Systems and Percolation Pits <br /> Order No. R5-2008 0148 <br /> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> concentrations and/or current concentrations. <br /> • The work detailed in the Work Plan will be completed one year from the date the plan is <br /> approved and a report with the final evaluation will be submitted to the Central Valley <br /> Water Board one year and 30 days after the plan is approved. <br /> Central Valley Water Board staff concurs with the work plan contingent that you revise the <br /> work plan to address following comments: <br /> 1. Remove monitoring requirements for the septic systems at Building 899, Building 850, <br /> Building 834 and Building 812 from the Work Plan and include these septic systems in the <br /> site wide septic system evaluations specified in the Work Plan. <br /> 2. Central Valley Water Board staff is skeptical about LLNL's proposal to model transport in <br /> the vadose zone followed by fate and transport modeling of the saturated zone. As stated <br /> in the Order, LLNL well need to propose installation of groundwater monitoring wells at <br /> sites Where discharges from the percolation pits or septic systems have the potential to <br /> cause groundwater quality to exceed background water quality. <br /> 3. Propose to demonstrate that impermeable zones beneath the septic systems (e.g. 10 to 20 <br /> feet of clay) impede groundwater impacts from the septic systems and therefore did not <br /> require evaluation of potential to impact groundwater. <br /> 4. Propose to determine if attenuation of potential contaminants of concern exists beneath <br /> septic systems and how much soil is necessary for adequate attenuation. <br /> 5. State that in the final evaluation report to be submitted 1 November 2010, LLNL will <br /> include the following: <br /> a. A discussion of how the percolation pits and septic systems were grouped, which <br /> groupings have adequate monitoring wells and which require additional monitoring <br /> wells. <br /> b. For percolation pits and septic systems excluded from the evaluation, LLNL must <br /> describe the geology below the percolation pits and septic systems and substantiate the <br /> conclusion that hydraulic barriers are sufficient to prevent downward migration of and <br /> that impacted groundwater in perched zones will not impact groundwater in deeper <br /> zones over time. <br /> c. A discussion of how analytes were grouped. <br /> d. A discussion of available attenuation below the different groups of percolation pits and <br /> septic systems. <br /> e. A table with text discussing the reasons particular percolation pits and septic systems <br /> have been removed from further investigation, <br />