My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
31130
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544577
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:30:45 PM
Creation date
6/18/2019 2:11:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544577
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003698
FACILITY_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
31130
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303010
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
31130 CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TAE 1 - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED LATA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill, Corral Hollow Road/1-580, Tracy, San Joaquin County <br /> NA 1. Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, industry and <br /> other uses within 2000 feet of the site; <br /> o 2. ,Site maps. to wale, nfama impaCfc 4 ehrny%n /OCatinna of 1,600-gallon diesel tank <br /> q fom�er and existing tanks sty ems. g <br /> excavation contours and sample locations boring and monitoring well elevation contours, removed 2196 <br /> gradients, and nearby surface waters, buildings. streets, and subsurface utilities; <br /> 0 3.Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system diagrams, <br /> o 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site dis osal(guantity) 200 cu yd stockpiled soil aerated to 60 mg/kg TPH-d, and <br /> used to backfill the tank pit <br /> H5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; <br /> Q6. Tabulated results of all groundwater elevations and depths to water, 68 to 75 ft bgs <br /> o7.Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: Contaminated soil excavated to 23 ft bgs Confirmatory soil samples <br /> FN Detection limits for confirmation sampling <br /> ND for petroleum contaminants including MTBE <br /> oN Lead analyses <br /> FY-1 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil Limited to excavated soil <br /> and groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: <br /> Ry Lateral and y Vertical extent of soil contamination <br /> N Lateral and rNj Vertical extent of groundwater contamination <br /> NA 9.Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and <br /> groundwater remediation system; <br /> o10.Reports/information Q Unauthorized Release Form 4/15/96 Q QMRs(Dates) <br /> o Well and boring logs E PAR FRP N]Other(report name) Diesel Tank Removal 1116/97 <br /> Q11.Best Available Technology(BAT) used or an explanation for not using BA T* Removed tank and excavated to ND 23 ft <br /> bgs <br /> NA 12.Reasons why background wasrs unattainable using BAT, <br /> NA 13.Mass balance calculation of substance treated versus that remaining, <br /> NA 14.Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in risk <br /> assessments, and fate and transport modeling, <br /> 0 15.Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely Petroleum contamination was removed from this site and <br /> impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses;and replaced with backfill having 60 mg/kg TPH-d. This <br /> concentration is too low to impact water quality. <br /> FNAJ 16.WET or TCLP results <br /> ByComments. San Joaquin County has determined that no further site investigation or remedial action <br /> , is required at this site, and Board staff concur. Only 60 mg/kg TPH-d remained in the stockpiled <br /> Dater soil that was used at backfill in the tank pit The original contamination was excavated to ND. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.