Laserfiche WebLink
Final Release LLNL Site 300 (USDOE) <br /> If additional information concerning potential exposures or off-site contaminant concentrations <br /> becomes available that potentially changes our public health findings, ATSDR will reevaluate the <br /> potential for adverse health effects from LLNL Site 300-specific sources or releases. <br /> Comment: <br /> The PHA does not consider current health data in the Tracy community. There are many cancer <br /> victims in and around Tracy. Tracy has an elevated inhalation cancer risk that is three times the <br /> California State average. <br /> Response: <br /> The public health assessment process involves two primary scientific evaluations the exposure <br /> evaluation and the health effects evaluation. The exposure evaluation is always performed first <br /> to determine how much contamination is at a site, where it is, and how people might come into <br /> contact with it. If a completed exposure pathway exists, a further, more in-depth analysis will be <br /> performed, often including a health effects evaluation. If the exposure evaluation concludes that <br /> people have or could have been exposed to site-related hazardous substances, ATSDR scientists <br /> will determine whether these exposures may result in harmful effects. Data collected in the <br /> health effects evaluation can include results of medical, toxicological and epidemiological <br /> studies and data collected in disease registries. <br /> At Site 300, ATSDR scientists determined that there were no completed exposure pathways. <br /> This simply means that,based on currently available data, no one has been or is currently being <br /> exposed to contaminants related to Site 300 activities. Since exposure has not occurred,pursuing <br /> an in-depth investigation of health data of residents in the Tracy community is unnecessary. <br /> Comment: <br /> LLNL has recently proposed a new cleanup plan—the Risk Based End States Vision—that <br /> proposes to lower cleanup standards and limits on-site cleanup. <br /> Response: <br /> See the Response to the Comments under the Remedial Activities—Funding and Timeframe <br /> section of Appendix A. <br /> The Risk Based End States Vision is a proposal for clean-up activities at Site 300 that are based <br /> upon and driven by human and ecological risk receptors. It describes projected site conditions 20 <br /> years into the future and assumes that current remediation strategies already in place have worked <br /> effectively over this time period. This means that off-site contamination will have been reduced <br /> to levels that allow unrestricted use of groundwater, and on-site contamination will have been <br /> reduced to a level that prevents further contaminated groundwater migration off-site. Once this <br /> B-2 <br />