SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2

Home Browse Search

Mr.Michael J.Infurna,Jr.—San Jo' uin County Public Health Services—Environmental Healtb*M,'i0v'ision July 9,2001 Page 2 indicate that on at least one occasion, you acknowledged our on-time record and indicated general satisfaction with our submittals. As of the date of this letter, GR is not aware of any submittals that are past due for this site. Based on the above discussion, it is Tosco's and GR's opinion that we should not be considered out of compliance with regard to the subject site. In fact, GR has aggressively pursued a scheduling option presented at the time of your February 9, 2001 letter. Also, GR has successfully adhered to the deadlines outlined in your March 29, 2001 letter and the timetable outlined in GR's April 13, 2001 letter. However, in an effort to further clarify our plans for the subject site, GR is proposing the following schedule we discussed during our phone conversation on June 25, 2001: • July 13, 2001: due date for submittal of well installation work plan as recommended in GR's Subsurface Investigation Deport, dated Jure 8, 2001. • August 15, 2001: drilling and well installation to be completed. This due date is contingent on GR's ability to obtain encroachment permits in a timely fashion. GR will prepare the permit submittals ahead of time and will submit them immediately upon receiving concurrence for our work plan from the PHS-EHD. • October 1, 2001: due date for submittal of well installation report. Again, this due date is contingent on GR's ability to obtain encroachment permits in a timely fashion. • November 1, 2001: due date for submittal of work plan for additional investigation work, as warranted, based on the results of the well installation work. • OR, December 1, 2001 (this deadline would supplant the November 1, 2001 deadline): deadline for submittal of the PAR, provided the data from the well installation phase is adequate to complete the PAR. With submission of this schedule, Tosco and GR are requesting that you indicate our in- compliance status for the subject site in writing. In addition, you should indicate our compliance retroactive to the due date of the Work Plan for Subsurface Investigation, which is March 15, 2001. Again, GR is not aware of any submittal being past due for the subject site. Therefore, our efforts to date should allow for processing of Reimbursement Request No. 4, submitted to the SWRCB UST Cleanup Fund by BP Oil Company. If still consider the site to be out of compliance, please provide clarification of your reasons. Should you require further information about the scheduled work, please do not hesitate to call me at(925)551-7555. Sincerely, Gettler-Ryan Inc. %DouglasLee, R.G. Project Manager cc: Mr.Ed Ralston,Tosco Marketing Company Mr. Scott Hooton, BP Oil Company Ms. Cristina Ochoa, Payments Unit, SWRCB UST Cleanup Fund 140245.05 2