Laserfiche WebLink
76/former BP# 11192 page 2 <br /> 1403 Country Club Blvd, Stockton May 28, 2010 <br /> The Plan is the response to the comments noted in the EHD letter of July 9, 2009, and proposes <br /> the installation of three monitoring wells - one shallow A-zone monitoring well and one B-zone <br /> monitoring well offsite and one D-zone onsite monitoring well. <br /> The Plan includes installation of MW-14 (B-zone) and MW-15 (A-zone) approximately 350 to <br /> 380 feet offsite to the northeast, beyond Shell's A and B zone wells that are approximately <br /> 250 feet northeast of the 76/BP site. Limited 2008 TBA groundwater data collected from these <br /> Shell wells indicate that 16 micrograms per liter (ug/1) was present in monitoring well S-6 (A- <br /> zone) and 88 ug/I of TBA is in monitoring well S-15 (B-zone). Shell's C-zone well in this area, <br /> (S-17), was non-detect for TBA. <br /> The EHD has concluded that the proposed placement of monitoring wells MW-14 and MW-15 <br /> may be too far to the east and may not provide a sufficient understanding of the lateral extent of <br /> TBA-impacted groundwater. Without a groundwater investigation to the north and north- <br /> northwest of MW-11 in the C-zone where no data is currently available, the EHD has concluded <br /> that the Plan may is not adequate and does not fulfill the EHD requirements to define the lateral <br /> extents of the TBA contamination documented in MW-11. An additional C-zone groundwater <br /> investigation along Elmwood Avenue, west of Pershing Avenue and along Pershing Avenue at, <br /> and north of the intersection of Elmwood and Pershing Avenues, is needed to better <br /> characterize the distribution of TBA-impacted groundwater and to select optimum monitoring <br /> points. The EHD recommends a series of soil borings with grab groundwater sampling <br /> collection be proposed and completed before additional monitoring wells are proposed. <br /> After reviewing the most recent groundwater data from the 76/BP and the Shell site across the <br /> street, the EHD has determined that the Plan is inadequate as submitted and does not address <br /> all of the requirements established by the EHD. The Plan is not approved. [H&S <br /> 25296.10(c)(3)]. A revision is needed that addresses the EHD's comments noted above. The <br /> revision is due on Geotracker for review by the EHD on July 7, 2010. <br /> You may contact Michael Infurna at (209)468-3454 if you have any questions. <br /> Michael J. Infurna Jr., REHS Nuel C. Henderson Jr., PG <br /> Senior Registered Environmental Health Specialist Engineering Geologist <br /> c: Mr. James L. Barton, CVRWQCB <br /> Mr. Mark Owens, SWRCB <br /> Mr. Brad Shelton, Stantec, 3017 Kilgore Road #100, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 <br />