Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING REPORT <br /> BP Oil Company Service Station No. 11192 <br /> 1403 Country Club Boulevard <br /> Stockton, California <br /> Al <br /> Project No. 10-037-05-002 M": E LAO 4;E I V or m4p <br /> January 5, 1996 <br /> FNS IN0NMWKITAL 14tAkTH <br /> I'-HPMIT/5E V10IF( <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> Taus report presents the results and findings of the October 20, 1995 groundwater monitoring <br /> and sampling conducted by Alisto Engineering Group at BP Oil Company Service Station <br /> No. 11192, 1.403 Country Club Boulevard, Stockton, California. A site vicinity map is shown <br /> on Figure 1. <br /> FIELD PROCEDURES <br /> Field activities were performed in accordance with the procedures and guidelines of <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services and the California Regional Water Quality <br /> Control Board, Central Valley Region. <br /> Before purging and sampling, the groundwater level in each well was measured from a <br /> permanent mark on top of the casing to the nearest 0.01 foot using an electronic sounder. <br /> The depth to groundwater and top of casing elevation data were used to calculate the <br /> groundwater elevation in each well in reference to mean sea level. The survey data and <br /> groundwater elevation measurements collected to date are presented in Table 1. - <br /> Before sample collection, each well was purged of 3 casing volumes, while recording field <br /> readings of pH, temperature, electrical conductivity, and dissolved oxygen. Groundwater <br /> samples were collected for laboratory analysis by lowering a bottom-fill, disposable bailer to <br /> just below the water level in the well. The samples were transferred from the bailer into <br /> laboratory-supplied containers. The water sampling field survey forms are presented in <br /> Appendix A. <br /> SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The results of monitoring and laboratory analysis of the groundwater samples for this and <br /> previous quarters are summarized in Table 1. The potentiometric groundwater elevations as <br /> interpreted from the results of this monitoring event are shown on Figure 2. The results of <br /> groundwater analysis are shown on Figure 3. The laboratory report and chain of custody <br /> record are presented in Appendix B. <br />