Laserfiche WebLink
t N <br /> tl t l <br /> t t I <br /> Fust Weekly Lvent of November 16,2000,Groundwater Purging and Dgxmal Casco(Fonner 13P)Station No iii 1192 <br /> • Deoemlx-r 7 2000 <br /> 1! <br /> MTBE Mass Removal <br /> The estimated mass of MTBE removed.was calculated using the average the MTBE concentration <br /> from the pre-purging (MW-3-PRE) and post-purging' (MW-3-POST) grab groundwater samples <br /> t <br /> F Based on this average concentration, an estimated total of 2 87 pounds of MTBE was removed from r <br /> the site during the November 16, 2000 purging event ' The estimated MTBE removed and the <br /> calculation method are presented in Table 1 <br /> Well Search <br /> GR personnel conducted a visual search of a 19 block area centered on the site to look for evidence of water <br /> wells in this vicinity Specific features which might indicate the presence of wells, such as pressure tanks, <br /> old water tower structures, or extra power lues to well houses were not observed in this area A search of <br /> the GeoTracker N%ebsite GM//veotracker2 arsenaultlegg con) Avill be conducted to locate municipal wells <br /> in the vicinity of the site In addition, GR is currently initiating a DWR well search for wells within 2000 <br /> " feet ofthe site The results of the well search efforts will be presented in a future report <br /> Performance Test <br /> In conjunction with the November 16, 2000 groundwater purging and sampling, GR conducted a <br /> performance test to qualitatively analyze the purging rates and the radii of Influence generated during the <br /> removal of groundwater from MW-3 and MW-7 Purging groundwater from MW-3 resulted in very <br /> minimal to no changes in the static groundwater levels in the other monitoring wells e-xcept in MW-7, <br /> located less than 4 feet from MW-3, as shown on Figure 1 Similarly purging groundwater from MW-7 <br /> resulted in no change in the static groundwater levels in the other monitoring wells except in MW-3 In this <br /> pair of wells, purging groundwater from one resulted in a 3 to 6 foot drop in groundwater levels in the <br /> adjacent well After purging was completed, the recovery of MW-3 was monitored The water level <br /> recovered from 25' 15 feet to 15 50 feet in 21 minutes Based on the results of the water levels collected <br /> during the performance test, the radii of influence formed by purging of MW-3 and MW-7 could not be ' <br /> observed due to the large distances (95 to 130 feet) bet\vicen the purged N\ells and the other c costing wells at <br /> the site Performance test data arc summarized in Table 2 <br /> s <br /> The On\A vacuum`trick purged groundwater from MW-3 for 329 minutes Approximately 2,400 gallons <br /> were removed at a purge rate of 7 3 gallons per minute (gpm) The vacuum trick removed groundwater r , <br /> from MW-7 for 103 minutes, recovering approximately 600 gallons of groundwater fora purge rate of 5 8 <br /> gpm! Based on these results, MW-3 can be purged ata greater rate and should be used for future purging <br /> events Purging rates are summanzed in Table 1 <br /> r <br /> , <br /> 14020502 <br />